1974Special report - Transportation Research Board, National Research CouncilRequires access

BEHAVIOURAL DEMAND MODELING AND VALUATION OF TRAVEL TIME. AGGREGATION PROBLEMS

D R Miller

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In the context of this workshop, the aggregation problem was primarily one of statistical inference for predictive purposes. Dissatisfaction with geographic aggregation (and aggregate analysis in general) has grown in part from the realization that the geographical zones upon which aggregate modeling is based are not homogeneous populations and, hence, are not appropriate units for aggregation. Disaggregate, stochastic transportation choice models have developed rapidly in recent years. These models estimate the probability that an individual traveler will select a mode, based on characteristics of the traveler, the environment, and the available choices. These disaggregate models have recently been applied to the prediction of future travel behavior. The basic problem of aggregation associated with use of disaggregate stochastic models appeared at this point. The problem was the use of such models to expand individual probability-of-choice estimates to describe travel-choice behavior of groups. Disaggregate modeling did not create the problem; it merely made it explicit. An additional issue discussed in the workshop was the role of attitudinal variables in explaining travel choice. Research is currently under way to investigate the potential of attitudinal variables for predicting travel behavior. In this research, there is a problem of separating groups of travelers according to their attitudes and other characteristics and of disaggregating so as to maximize between-group and minimize within-group variance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the context of this workshop, the aggregation problem was primarily one of statistical inference for predictive purposes. Dissatisfaction with geographic aggregation (and aggregate analysis in general) has grown in part from the realization that the geographical zones upon which aggregate modeling is based are not homogeneous populations and, hence, are not appropriate units for aggregation. Disaggregate, stochastic transportation choice models have developed rapidly in recent years. These models estimate the probability that an individual traveler will select a mode, based on characteristics of the traveler, the environment, and the available choices. These disaggregate models have recently been applied to the prediction of future travel behavior. The basic problem of aggregation associated with use of disaggregate stochastic models appeared at this point. The problem was the use of such models to expand individual probability-of-choice estimates to describe travel-choice behavior of groups. Disaggregate modeling did not create the problem; it merely made it explicit. An additional issue discussed in the workshop was the role of attitudinal variables in explaining travel choice. Research is currently under way to investigate the potential of attitudinal variables for predicting travel behavior. In this research, there is a problem of separating groups of travelers according to their attitudes and other characteristics and of disaggregating so as to maximize between-group and minimize within-group variance.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the context of this workshop, the aggregation problem was primarily one of statistical inference for predictive purposes. Dissatisfaction with geographic aggregation (and aggregate analysis in general) has grown in part from the realization that the geographical zones upon which aggregate modeling is based are not homogeneous populations and, hence, are not appropriate units for aggregation. Disaggregate, stochastic transportation choice models have developed rapidly in recent years. These models estimate the probability that an individual traveler will select a mode, based on characteristics of the traveler, the environment, and the available choices. These disaggregate models have recently been applied to the prediction of future travel behavior. The basic problem of aggregation associated with use of disaggregate stochastic models appeared at this point. The problem was the use of such models to expand individual probability-of-choice estimates to describe travel-choice behavior of groups. Disaggregate modeling did not create the problem; it merely made it explicit. An additional issue discussed in the workshop was the role of attitudinal variables in explaining travel choice. Research is currently under way to investigate the potential of attitudinal variables for predicting travel behavior. In this research, there is a problem of separating groups of travelers according to their attitudes and other characteristics and of disaggregating so as to maximize between-group and minimize within-group variance.

Key concepts: Aggregate (composite), Travel behavior, Aggregation problem, Econometrics, Computer science, Discrete choice, Context (archaeology), Mode choice

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
BEHAVIOURAL DEMAND MODELING AND VALUATION OF TRAVEL TIME. AGGREGATION PROBLEMS — Research Paper | ScholarLens