1989Unpublished venueRequires access

SUB-TOPIC 3. FINANCING OF TRANSPORT SYSTEM OPERATIONS: (A) RAIL. RESOURCES FOR TOMORROW'S TRANSPORT. INTRODUCTORY REPORTS AND SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS. 11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY AND PRACTICE IN TRANSPORT ECONOMICS, BRUSSELS, SEPTEMBER 12-14, 1988

Lisa Hansson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The railways have suffered market share losses and financial problems which pose challenges for transport policy in most countries. The author suggests that the answer goes beyond improving efficiency to the development of transport policy and implementation of new conditions on the transport market. The railway situation is compared to the 'road model' where infrastructure is treated separately. The situation is discussed and analysed with particular reference to Sweden on the basis of three questions: why are the public transport financial results completely separated from road network issues; why is it generally accepted that public transport is subsidised; and why are private bus companies making profits in public transport despite the overall financial results? Swedish transport strategies are examined and market imperfections explained. The evaluation of external effects is considered and the need to take a long-term perspective of collective well-being noted. The financing of Swedish Rail and the setting up of the National Railway Administration are discussed. A 'second best' pricing strategy is outlined based on current net damage levels modified in response to changes. The use of the word subsidy is examined and a role as private entrepreneur suggested for Swedish Rail. For the covering abstract of the symposium see IRRD 829766.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The railways have suffered market share losses and financial problems which pose challenges for transport policy in most countries. The author suggests that the answer goes beyond improving efficiency to the development of transport policy and implementation of new conditions on the transport market. The railway situation is compared to the 'road model' where infrastructure is treated separately. The situation is discussed and analysed with particular reference to Sweden on the basis of three questions: why are the public transport financial results completely separated from road network issues; why is it generally accepted that public transport is subsidised; and why are private bus companies making profits in public transport despite the overall financial results? Swedish transport strategies are examined and market imperfections explained. The evaluation of external effects is considered and the need to take a long-term perspective of collective well-being noted. The financing of Swedish Rail and the setting up of the National Railway Administration are discussed. A 'second best' pricing strategy is outlined based on current net damage levels modified in response to changes. The use of the word subsidy is examined and a role as private entrepreneur suggested for Swedish Rail. For the covering abstract of the symposium see IRRD 829766.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The railways have suffered market share losses and financial problems which pose challenges for transport policy in most countries. The author suggests that the answer goes beyond improving efficiency to the development of transport policy and implementation of new conditions on the transport market. The railway situation is compared to the 'road model' where infrastructure is treated separately. The situation is discussed and analysed with particular reference to Sweden on the basis of three questions: why are the public transport financial results completely separated from road network issues; why is it generally accepted that public transport is subsidised; and why are private bus companies making profits in public transport despite the overall financial results? Swedish transport strategies are examined and market imperfections explained. The evaluation of external effects is considered and the need to take a long-term perspective of collective well-being noted. The financing of Swedish Rail and the setting up of the National Railway Administration are discussed. A 'second best' pricing strategy is outlined based on current net damage levels modified in response to changes. The use of the word subsidy is examined and a role as private entrepreneur suggested for Swedish Rail. For the covering abstract of the symposium see IRRD 829766.

Key concepts: Subsidy, Public transport, Finance, Private transport, Transport policy, Economics, Business, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SUB-TOPIC 3. FINANCING OF TRANSPORT SYSTEM OPERATIONS: (A) RAIL. RESOURCES FOR TOMORROW'S TRANSPORT. INTRODUCTORY REPORTS AND SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS. 11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY AND PRACTICE IN TRANSPORT ECONOMICS, BRUSSELS, SEPTEMBER 12-14, 1988 — Research Paper | ScholarLens