2004•Publication of: RoutledgeRequires access

AN EXCHANGE ON BUILDING U.S. ROAD CAPACITY: THE POLITICS OF GRIDLOCK. IN: MOVING PEOPLE, GOODS, AND INFORMATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY: THE CUTTING-EDGE INFRASTRUCTURES OF NETWORKED CITIES

Raymond C. Atkinson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter on building U.S. road capacity and the politics of gridlock is from a book on moving people, goods, and information in the 21st century. The author first reviews the history of building the transportation infrastructure and the development of congestion, as well as some of the political conflicts that have arisen over various options proposed to address these problems. The author then frames the politics of transportation as a battle among three groups: auto-suburban status quo defenders (including developers, many chambers of commerce, automobile associations, and highway builders) who work to continue old patterns; anti-car, anti-suburban activists who seek to get people out of their cars and single-family suburban homes; and reformers who appreciate the vast benefits of the auto-suburban system but recognize the increasing costs that must be dealt with. In the remainder of the chapter, the author describes how the third-way framework can become the dominant approach. Strategies covered include: respect the desire of Americans to live where they want to live, reject today's fashionable defeatism about congestion, speed development and deployment of new transportation technologies, streamline regulatory and review processes, create regional transportation councils, reduce public subsidies and rely more on user fees and public-private partnerships, and restructure the relationship between the federal government and the states.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter on building U.S. road capacity and the politics of gridlock is from a book on moving people, goods, and information in the 21st century. The author first reviews the history of building the transportation infrastructure and the development of congestion, as well as some of the political conflicts that have arisen over various options proposed to address these problems. The author then frames the politics of transportation as a battle among three groups: auto-suburban status quo defenders (including developers, many chambers of commerce, automobile associations, and highway builders) who work to continue old patterns; anti-car, anti-suburban activists who seek to get people out of their cars and single-family suburban homes; and reformers who appreciate the vast benefits of the auto-suburban system but recognize the increasing costs that must be dealt with. In the remainder of the chapter, the author describes how the third-way framework can become the dominant approach. Strategies covered include: respect the desire of Americans to live where they want to live, reject today's fashionable defeatism about congestion, speed development and deployment of new transportation technologies, streamline regulatory and review processes, create regional transportation councils, reduce public subsidies and rely more on user fees and public-private partnerships, and restructure the relationship between the federal government and the states.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter on building U.S. road capacity and the politics of gridlock is from a book on moving people, goods, and information in the 21st century. The author first reviews the history of building the transportation infrastructure and the development of congestion, as well as some of the political conflicts that have arisen over various options proposed to address these problems. The author then frames the politics of transportation as a battle among three groups: auto-suburban status quo defenders (including developers, many chambers of commerce, automobile associations, and highway builders) who work to continue old patterns; anti-car, anti-suburban activists who seek to get people out of their cars and single-family suburban homes; and reformers who appreciate the vast benefits of the auto-suburban system but recognize the increasing costs that must be dealt with. In the remainder of the chapter, the author describes how the third-way framework can become the dominant approach. Strategies covered include: respect the desire of Americans to live where they want to live, reject today's fashionable defeatism about congestion, speed development and deployment of new transportation technologies, streamline regulatory and review processes, create regional transportation councils, reduce public subsidies and rely more on user fees and public-private partnerships, and restructure the relationship between the federal government and the states.

Key concepts: Gridlock, Politics, Government (linguistics), Public transport, Subsidy, Status quo, Business, Public relations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AN EXCHANGE ON BUILDING U.S. ROAD CAPACITY: THE POLITICS OF GRIDLOCK. IN: MOVING PEOPLE, GOODS, AND INFORMATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY: THE CUTTING-EDGE INFRASTRUCTURES OF NETWORKED CITIES — Research Paper | ScholarLens