1999Unpublished venueRequires access

THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM: A REEXAMINATION AND UPDATE

John F. Kain

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

This chapter is concerned primarily with the comparative costs of alternative transit technologies, the technological and operating choices made by transit managers, and the lessons learned from these choices. Experience strongly suggests that policymakers and transit managers generally erred by using disproportionate amounts of available subsidy dollars to construct and operate costly and ineffective rail transit systems instead of improving bus service and reducing fares. The author of this chapter also argues that the decision to convert the largely private transit industry to public ownership and operation was a serious mistake. Subsidy dollars could have been used to pay private transit operators to provide unprofitable, but desirable, services, and the efficiency gains from private operation could have been used to buy more vehicle miles of bus service and lower fares. At the same time, governments failed to charge urban motorists prices that reflect the long-run social costs of providing highway facilities and services.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter is concerned primarily with the comparative costs of alternative transit technologies, the technological and operating choices made by transit managers, and the lessons learned from these choices. Experience strongly suggests that policymakers and transit managers generally erred by using disproportionate amounts of available subsidy dollars to construct and operate costly and ineffective rail transit systems instead of improving bus service and reducing fares. The author of this chapter also argues that the decision to convert the largely private transit industry to public ownership and operation was a serious mistake. Subsidy dollars could have been used to pay private transit operators to provide unprofitable, but desirable, services, and the efficiency gains from private operation could have been used to buy more vehicle miles of bus service and lower fares. At the same time, governments failed to charge urban motorists prices that reflect the long-run social costs of providing highway facilities and services.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter is concerned primarily with the comparative costs of alternative transit technologies, the technological and operating choices made by transit managers, and the lessons learned from these choices. Experience strongly suggests that policymakers and transit managers generally erred by using disproportionate amounts of available subsidy dollars to construct and operate costly and ineffective rail transit systems instead of improving bus service and reducing fares. The author of this chapter also argues that the decision to convert the largely private transit industry to public ownership and operation was a serious mistake. Subsidy dollars could have been used to pay private transit operators to provide unprofitable, but desirable, services, and the efficiency gains from private operation could have been used to buy more vehicle miles of bus service and lower fares. At the same time, governments failed to charge urban motorists prices that reflect the long-run social costs of providing highway facilities and services.

Key concepts: Subsidy, Public transport, Business, Service (business), Transit (satellite), Transport engineering, Mistake, Public economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM: A REEXAMINATION AND UPDATE — Research Paper | ScholarLens