2000Unpublished venueRequires access

OFF-ROAD FACILITIES FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY EDUCATION AND NOVICE DRIVER TRAINING: A CAUTIONARY TALE

R Christie

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Despite the lack of scientific evidence that off-road facilities such as children's traffic schools and driver-training centres contribute to reduced road accident risk among target groups, support for off-road training and education survives in some sectors of the community. This paper reviews the Australian and international research evidence regarding the efficacy of off-road traffic schools for young children and the use of off-road driver training for novice drivers. The reasons why programs provided at such facilities contribute little to reduced road accident risk/involvement among children and novice drivers are discussed. Alternative approaches such as children's traffic clubs for young children are also considered. On-road experience building programs, such as those promoted by VicRoads and TAC, are presented as superior alternatives to off-road driver training for beginning drivers. The paper concludes that resources invested in off-road traffic schools for young children and off-road driver training for novice drivers represent a poor road safety investment and divert scarce funds and community attention away from better-based accident reduction initiatives. It is recommended that local government, community organisations and funding bodies bear this in mind when addressing road safety needs at the local or regional level. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E206098.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Despite the lack of scientific evidence that off-road facilities such as children's traffic schools and driver-training centres contribute to reduced road accident risk among target groups, support for off-road training and education survives in some sectors of the community. This paper reviews the Australian and international research evidence regarding the efficacy of off-road traffic schools for young children and the use of off-road driver training for novice drivers. The reasons why programs provided at such facilities contribute little to reduced road accident risk/involvement among children and novice drivers are discussed. Alternative approaches such as children's traffic clubs for young children are also considered. On-road experience building programs, such as those promoted by VicRoads and TAC, are presented as superior alternatives to off-road driver training for beginning drivers. The paper concludes that resources invested in off-road traffic schools for young children and off-road driver training for novice drivers represent a poor road safety investment and divert scarce funds and community attention away from better-based accident reduction initiatives. It is recommended that local government, community organisations and funding bodies bear this in mind when addressing road safety needs at the local or regional level. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E206098.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Despite the lack of scientific evidence that off-road facilities such as children's traffic schools and driver-training centres contribute to reduced road accident risk among target groups, support for off-road training and education survives in some sectors of the community. This paper reviews the Australian and international research evidence regarding the efficacy of off-road traffic schools for young children and the use of off-road driver training for novice drivers. The reasons why programs provided at such facilities contribute little to reduced road accident risk/involvement among children and novice drivers are discussed. Alternative approaches such as children's traffic clubs for young children are also considered. On-road experience building programs, such as those promoted by VicRoads and TAC, are presented as superior alternatives to off-road driver training for beginning drivers. The paper concludes that resources invested in off-road traffic schools for young children and off-road driver training for novice drivers represent a poor road safety investment and divert scarce funds and community attention away from better-based accident reduction initiatives. It is recommended that local government, community organisations and funding bodies bear this in mind when addressing road safety needs at the local or regional level. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E206098.

Key concepts: Training (meteorology), Transport engineering, Government (linguistics), Investment (military), Business, Engineering, Geography, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source