1989•Mechanical EngineeringRequires access

POWER PLANT DIAGNOSTICS GO ON-LINE

J Rosen

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The current standard approaches to power plant maintenance are: (1) corrective maintenance, which involves fixing something when it breaks and (2) preventive maintenance, which is scheduled periodically based on the recommendations of manufacturers and the experience of the plant operator. Predictive maintenance, which this article explains, is a relatively new concept. It makes early fault detection possible by monitoring machine parameters and process variables and by comparing these measurements with normal baseline readings. A study cited indicated that the annual power plant maintenance cost per horsepower for the corrective approach was $17-$18; for the preventive approach, $11-$13; and for the predictive approach, $7-$9. A test program of the Philadelphia Electric Company and the Electric Power Research Institute to more thoroughly explore the value of online predictive maintenance and evaluate future diagnostic monitoring needs is discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The current standard approaches to power plant maintenance are: (1) corrective maintenance, which involves fixing something when it breaks and (2) preventive maintenance, which is scheduled periodically based on the recommendations of manufacturers and the experience of the plant operator. Predictive maintenance, which this article explains, is a relatively new concept. It makes early fault detection possible by monitoring machine parameters and process variables and by comparing these measurements with normal baseline readings. A study cited indicated that the annual power plant maintenance cost per horsepower for the corrective approach was $17-$18; for the preventive approach, $11-$13; and for the predictive approach, $7-$9. A test program of the Philadelphia Electric Company and the Electric Power Research Institute to more thoroughly explore the value of online predictive maintenance and evaluate future diagnostic monitoring needs is discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The current standard approaches to power plant maintenance are: (1) corrective maintenance, which involves fixing something when it breaks and (2) preventive maintenance, which is scheduled periodically based on the recommendations of manufacturers and the experience of the plant operator. Predictive maintenance, which this article explains, is a relatively new concept. It makes early fault detection possible by monitoring machine parameters and process variables and by comparing these measurements with normal baseline readings. A study cited indicated that the annual power plant maintenance cost per horsepower for the corrective approach was $17-$18; for the preventive approach, $11-$13; and for the predictive approach, $7-$9. A test program of the Philadelphia Electric Company and the Electric Power Research Institute to more thoroughly explore the value of online predictive maintenance and evaluate future diagnostic monitoring needs is discussed.

Key concepts: Predictive maintenance, Corrective maintenance, Horsepower, Reliability engineering, Preventive maintenance, Engineering, Fault (geology), Planned maintenance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
POWER PLANT DIAGNOSTICS GO ON-LINE — Research Paper | ScholarLens