ScholarLens Back to search
2015•Scholarship @ Claremont (The Claremont Colleges)Requires access

Who Says What the Law Is: How Barack Obama’s Legal Philosophy is Reflected by His Judicial Appointees

Colin J. Spence

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

An examination of Barack Obama's Legal Philosophy and the extent to which that is reflected in the decisions of his judicial appointees.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An examination of Barack Obama's Legal Philosophy and the extent to which that is reflected in the decisions of his judicial appointees.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An examination of Barack Obama's Legal Philosophy and the extent to which that is reflected in the decisions of his judicial appointees.

Key concepts: Law, Political science, Philosophy of law, Law and economics, Sociology, Public law

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Who Says What the Law Is: How Barack Obama’s Legal Philosophy is Reflected by His Judicial Appointees — Research Paper | ScholarLens