2008Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University)Requires access

The Criminnal Responsibilty of Children

Thomas Howard Crofts III

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The age of criminal responsibility acts as a gate-keeping mechanism to the criminal justice system. It is the age at which society deems that its children are old enough to be held responsible for criminal acts and no longer in need of sheltering from the criminal law consequences of their behaviour. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child asks contracting states to establish a minimum age 'below which children shall be presumed not to have the capacity to infringe penal law'. In all Australian criminal jurisdictions, protection of children from the criminal justice system takes the form of two age barriers. First, a lower one under which a child is conclusively presumed too young to ever be capable of guilt (currently under the age of 10) and a higher one where the presumption of criminal incapacity (sometimes termed the presumption of doli incapax) is conditional and, therefore, rebuttable. This rebuttable presumption applies from the age of l0 to 14.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The age of criminal responsibility acts as a gate-keeping mechanism to the criminal justice system. It is the age at which society deems that its children are old enough to be held responsible for criminal acts and no longer in need of sheltering from the criminal law consequences of their behaviour. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child asks contracting states to establish a minimum age 'below which children shall be presumed not to have the capacity to infringe penal law'. In all Australian criminal jurisdictions, protection of children from the criminal justice system takes the form of two age barriers. First, a lower one under which a child is conclusively presumed too young to ever be capable of guilt (currently under the age of 10) and a higher one where the presumption of criminal incapacity (sometimes termed the presumption of doli incapax) is conditional and, therefore, rebuttable. This rebuttable presumption applies from the age of l0 to 14.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The age of criminal responsibility acts as a gate-keeping mechanism to the criminal justice system. It is the age at which society deems that its children are old enough to be held responsible for criminal acts and no longer in need of sheltering from the criminal law consequences of their behaviour. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child asks contracting states to establish a minimum age 'below which children shall be presumed not to have the capacity to infringe penal law'. In all Australian criminal jurisdictions, protection of children from the criminal justice system takes the form of two age barriers. First, a lower one under which a child is conclusively presumed too young to ever be capable of guilt (currently under the age of 10) and a higher one where the presumption of criminal incapacity (sometimes termed the presumption of doli incapax) is conditional and, therefore, rebuttable. This rebuttable presumption applies from the age of l0 to 14.

Key concepts: Presumption, Criminal justice, Criminal responsibility, Criminal law, Political science, Law, Economic Justice, Criminology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Criminnal Responsibilty of Children — Research Paper | ScholarLens