1996•bepress Legal RepositoryRequires access

Beyond Civil Rights: Considering "Third Generation" International Human Rights Law in the United States

Natsu Taylor Saito

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

A fundamental principle of international law, articulated by the decisions of the Nuremberg Tribunals, is that there are universal human rights which every person and every government must respect. … Incorporating international human rights principles could provide common ground among minority groups within the United States, among poor and working peoples generally, and those who struggle for similar rights in the United States and in other countries. … The United States has ratified the ICCPR, but not the ICESCR. … Article 1, Section 1 of both the ICCPR and the ICESCR read as follows: "All peoples have the right of self-determination. … Carter signed both the ICCPR and the ICESCR in 1977, as well as the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR) and the CERD. … The ICCPR was not ratified by the U.S. Senate until 1992 and the CERD was only ratified in 1994. The ICESCR and ACHR have yet to be ratified. … Even though the United States has not ratified many of the human rights conventions, and has extensive reservations with respect to those it has ratified, much of the core of international human rights law is applicable to the United States as part of customary international law. … Less frequently have there been assertions of the collective rights of minority groups, at least racial or ethnic minorities, to some form of self-determination

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A fundamental principle of international law, articulated by the decisions of the Nuremberg Tribunals, is that there are universal human rights which every person and every government must respect. … Incorporating international human rights principles could provide common ground among minority groups within the United States, among poor and working peoples generally, and those who struggle for similar rights in the United States and in other countries. … The United States has ratified the ICCPR, but not the ICESCR. … Article 1, Section 1 of both the ICCPR and the ICESCR read as follows: "All peoples have the right of self-determination. … Carter signed both the ICCPR and the ICESCR in 1977, as well as the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR) and the CERD. … The ICCPR was not ratified by the U.S. Senate until 1992 and the CERD was only ratified in 1994. The ICESCR and ACHR have yet to be ratified. … Even though the United States has not ratified many of the human rights conventions, and has extensive reservations with respect to those it has ratified, much of the core of international human rights law is applicable to the United States as part of customary international law. … Less frequently have there been assertions of the collective rights of minority groups, at least racial or ethnic minorities, to some form of self-determination

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A fundamental principle of international law, articulated by the decisions of the Nuremberg Tribunals, is that there are universal human rights which every person and every government must respect. … Incorporating international human rights principles could provide common ground among minority groups within the United States, among poor and working peoples generally, and those who struggle for similar rights in the United States and in other countries. … The United States has ratified the ICCPR, but not the ICESCR. … Article 1, Section 1 of both the ICCPR and the ICESCR read as follows: "All peoples have the right of self-determination. … Carter signed both the ICCPR and the ICESCR in 1977, as well as the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR) and the CERD. … The ICCPR was not ratified by the U.S. Senate until 1992 and the CERD was only ratified in 1994. The ICESCR and ACHR have yet to be ratified. … Even though the United States has not ratified many of the human rights conventions, and has extensive reservations with respect to those it has ratified, much of the core of international human rights law is applicable to the United States as part of customary international law. … Less frequently have there been assertions of the collective rights of minority groups, at least racial or ethnic minorities, to some form of self-determination

Key concepts: Political science, Human rights, International human rights law, Law, Right to property, Civil rights, Fundamental rights, Reservation of rights

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Beyond Civil Rights: Considering "Third Generation" International Human Rights Law in the United States — Research Paper | ScholarLens