2014•European Review of International StudiesRequires access

Multilateralism, the UN and the EU

Paul Taylor

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This essay discusses current sticking-points in the development of multilateralism at the global, UN, and regional, EU, levels. In particular it attempts to explain those sticking points, to locate any similarities between them at the two levels, and how they affected each other. The usual assumption in writing about multilateralism is that it has become denser, in the sense that it appears in an increasing number of policy sectors, and that it has become entrenched, in that the norms and principles which sustain it, are more widely and more strongly, supported. But this has not been a process of steadily increasing multilateralism, but rather, as will be shown, one of periods of advance and periods of difficulty. The current difficulties are seen in what follows as sticking-points.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This essay discusses current sticking-points in the development of multilateralism at the global, UN, and regional, EU, levels. In particular it attempts to explain those sticking points, to locate any similarities between them at the two levels, and how they affected each other. The usual assumption in writing about multilateralism is that it has become denser, in the sense that it appears in an increasing number of policy sectors, and that it has become entrenched, in that the norms and principles which sustain it, are more widely and more strongly, supported. But this has not been a process of steadily increasing multilateralism, but rather, as will be shown, one of periods of advance and periods of difficulty. The current difficulties are seen in what follows as sticking-points.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This essay discusses current sticking-points in the development of multilateralism at the global, UN, and regional, EU, levels. In particular it attempts to explain those sticking points, to locate any similarities between them at the two levels, and how they affected each other. The usual assumption in writing about multilateralism is that it has become denser, in the sense that it appears in an increasing number of policy sectors, and that it has become entrenched, in that the norms and principles which sustain it, are more widely and more strongly, supported. But this has not been a process of steadily increasing multilateralism, but rather, as will be shown, one of periods of advance and periods of difficulty. The current difficulties are seen in what follows as sticking-points.

Key concepts: Multilateralism, Bilateralism, European union, Political science, International trade, Economics, Law, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multilateralism, the UN and the EU — Research Paper | ScholarLens