1958Chemical & Engineering NewsRequires access

Public Has "Right-to-Know"

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

NEEDED: A TOP PUBLIC CLASSIFICATION to replace Top Secret. Withholding information about government operations needs more justification than "mere executive whim." Hitting at government information policies was James S. Pope, Southern Newspaper Publishers Association, before the House Subcommittee on Government Information. The committee is holding hearings on bills to lift the secrecy covering government information. Clark R. Mollenhoff of the journalistic fraternity Sigma Delta Chi had harsh words for executive secrecy. Congress has let the Executive Branch whittle its power through secrecy tactics, says Mollenhoff. At the root of all the trouble is 5 USC 22, a government "housekeeping" act passed in 1789. This act authorizes an agency head to "prescribe regulations . . . for the custody, use, and preservation of the records . . ." The trouble comes with the word "preservation." Critics say thousands of junior executives in Government think it means to preserve public records from the public. To clear up ...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

NEEDED: A TOP PUBLIC CLASSIFICATION to replace Top Secret. Withholding information about government operations needs more justification than "mere executive whim." Hitting at government information policies was James S. Pope, Southern Newspaper Publishers Association, before the House Subcommittee on Government Information. The committee is holding hearings on bills to lift the secrecy covering government information. Clark R. Mollenhoff of the journalistic fraternity Sigma Delta Chi had harsh words for executive secrecy. Congress has let the Executive Branch whittle its power through secrecy tactics, says Mollenhoff. At the root of all the trouble is 5 USC 22, a government "housekeeping" act passed in 1789. This act authorizes an agency head to "prescribe regulations . . . for the custody, use, and preservation of the records . . ." The trouble comes with the word "preservation." Critics say thousands of junior executives in Government think it means to preserve public records from the public. To clear up ...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

NEEDED: A TOP PUBLIC CLASSIFICATION to replace Top Secret. Withholding information about government operations needs more justification than "mere executive whim." Hitting at government information policies was James S. Pope, Southern Newspaper Publishers Association, before the House Subcommittee on Government Information. The committee is holding hearings on bills to lift the secrecy covering government information. Clark R. Mollenhoff of the journalistic fraternity Sigma Delta Chi had harsh words for executive secrecy. Congress has let the Executive Branch whittle its power through secrecy tactics, says Mollenhoff. At the root of all the trouble is 5 USC 22, a government "housekeeping" act passed in 1789. This act authorizes an agency head to "prescribe regulations . . . for the custody, use, and preservation of the records . . ." The trouble comes with the word "preservation." Critics say thousands of junior executives in Government think it means to preserve public records from the public. To clear up ...

Key concepts: Citation, Secrecy, Computer science, Social media, Legislation, Icon, Internet privacy, Library science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public Has "Right-to-Know" — Research Paper | ScholarLens