1988•Unpublished venueRequires access

BRIDGE DECK PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS. FINAL REPORT

G J Malasheskie, Dean A. Maurer, D B Mellott, J L Arellano

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and cost of various bridge deck protective systems. The effectiveness of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation's policy and decision making in determining the best reinforcement protection system for particular applications and situations will also be evaluated. This project included the evaluation of twenty-one level bridge decks and one hundred forty-eight level bridge decks at locations throughout Pennsylvania. Visual inspections and physical testing were performed on level A decks. Only visual inspections were done on level B decks. The systems evaluated in this study include epoxy-coated reinforcing steel, galvanized reinforcing steel, waterproofing membranes, latex-modified concrete, latex-modified concrete over salt contaminated decks, and low slump dense concrete.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this report is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and cost of various bridge deck protective systems. The effectiveness of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation's policy and decision making in determining the best reinforcement protection system for particular applications and situations will also be evaluated. This project included the evaluation of twenty-one level bridge decks and one hundred forty-eight level bridge decks at locations throughout Pennsylvania. Visual inspections and physical testing were performed on level A decks. Only visual inspections were done on level B decks. The systems evaluated in this study include epoxy-coated reinforcing steel, galvanized reinforcing steel, waterproofing membranes, latex-modified concrete, latex-modified concrete over salt contaminated decks, and low slump dense concrete.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this report is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and cost of various bridge deck protective systems. The effectiveness of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation's policy and decision making in determining the best reinforcement protection system for particular applications and situations will also be evaluated. This project included the evaluation of twenty-one level bridge decks and one hundred forty-eight level bridge decks at locations throughout Pennsylvania. Visual inspections and physical testing were performed on level A decks. Only visual inspections were done on level B decks. The systems evaluated in this study include epoxy-coated reinforcing steel, galvanized reinforcing steel, waterproofing membranes, latex-modified concrete, latex-modified concrete over salt contaminated decks, and low slump dense concrete.

Key concepts: Bridge deck, Waterproofing, Bridge (graph theory), Deck, Engineering, Forensic engineering, Reinforced concrete, Structural engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
BRIDGE DECK PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS. FINAL REPORT — Research Paper | ScholarLens