1987Unpublished venueRequires access

EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF VARIOUS NDT DEVICES IN SIDE-BY-SIDE TESTING ON INDIANA HIGHWAYS. SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF ASPHALT PAVEMENTS, VOLUME I, PROCEEDINGS, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, JULY 13-17, 1987, ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN

Jay K. Lindly, N D Pumphrey, Thomas D. White, Virgil L. Anderson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

As part of a research program designed to provide an overlay design procedure for pavements in Indiana, four Nondestructive Deflection Testing (NDT) devices were compared side-by-side on 73 pavement sections in Indiana. The devices were the Dynaflect, the Road Rater 400, the Road Rater 2000, and the Dynatest Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD). The 73 sections represent overlaid flexible pavements and both overlaid and non-overlaid JRC pavements. Brief descriptions of activities performed prior to field testing - including data base development, statistical experiment design, and test section selection - are presented, as are preliminary findings from the first of two planned test sequences. Comparisons of the deflection basins and the deflection variations within pavement test sections are made. Equations are presented correlating deflections from the FWD with deflections from the other three devices. Finally, variables are calculated from the deflections and are used as indicators of relative pavement strength characteristics. These indicators are analyzed to predict which of the NDT devices offer the most usable deflection data for investigating pavement structural properties.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As part of a research program designed to provide an overlay design procedure for pavements in Indiana, four Nondestructive Deflection Testing (NDT) devices were compared side-by-side on 73 pavement sections in Indiana. The devices were the Dynaflect, the Road Rater 400, the Road Rater 2000, and the Dynatest Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD). The 73 sections represent overlaid flexible pavements and both overlaid and non-overlaid JRC pavements. Brief descriptions of activities performed prior to field testing - including data base development, statistical experiment design, and test section selection - are presented, as are preliminary findings from the first of two planned test sequences. Comparisons of the deflection basins and the deflection variations within pavement test sections are made. Equations are presented correlating deflections from the FWD with deflections from the other three devices. Finally, variables are calculated from the deflections and are used as indicators of relative pavement strength characteristics. These indicators are analyzed to predict which of the NDT devices offer the most usable deflection data for investigating pavement structural properties.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As part of a research program designed to provide an overlay design procedure for pavements in Indiana, four Nondestructive Deflection Testing (NDT) devices were compared side-by-side on 73 pavement sections in Indiana. The devices were the Dynaflect, the Road Rater 400, the Road Rater 2000, and the Dynatest Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD). The 73 sections represent overlaid flexible pavements and both overlaid and non-overlaid JRC pavements. Brief descriptions of activities performed prior to field testing - including data base development, statistical experiment design, and test section selection - are presented, as are preliminary findings from the first of two planned test sequences. Comparisons of the deflection basins and the deflection variations within pavement test sections are made. Equations are presented correlating deflections from the FWD with deflections from the other three devices. Finally, variables are calculated from the deflections and are used as indicators of relative pavement strength characteristics. These indicators are analyzed to predict which of the NDT devices offer the most usable deflection data for investigating pavement structural properties.

Key concepts: Deflection (physics), Nondestructive testing, Falling weight deflectometer, Engineering, Overlay, Structural engineering, Pavement engineering, Geotechnical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF VARIOUS NDT DEVICES IN SIDE-BY-SIDE TESTING ON INDIANA HIGHWAYS. SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF ASPHALT PAVEMENTS, VOLUME I, PROCEEDINGS, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, JULY 13-17, 1987, ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN — Research Paper | ScholarLens