200815th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems and ITS America's 2008 Annual MeetingITS AmericaERTICOITS JapanTransCoreRequires access

The Future of Automated Enforcement in the United States and Europe – Compare and Contrast

Colin Wilson, Glenn Hansen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The project will focus on improving the effectiveness of the enforcement of road traffic laws by automating the capture and recording of evidential data at the roadside through the use of camera-based technology. Automated enforcement has a proven impact on road safety by reducing the number and severity of collisions. It also encourages greater compliance with road traffic laws at a time when there are competing demands on law enforcement officials. This paper aims to give a brief comparison of how automated enforcement has been implemented in Europe and in the United States. It looks at both the similarities and differences in deployment and operation. It also explores what, if anything, law enforcement officials can learn from each other and highlights some of the challenges for the future of automated enforcement on both sides of the Atlantic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The project will focus on improving the effectiveness of the enforcement of road traffic laws by automating the capture and recording of evidential data at the roadside through the use of camera-based technology. Automated enforcement has a proven impact on road safety by reducing the number and severity of collisions. It also encourages greater compliance with road traffic laws at a time when there are competing demands on law enforcement officials. This paper aims to give a brief comparison of how automated enforcement has been implemented in Europe and in the United States. It looks at both the similarities and differences in deployment and operation. It also explores what, if anything, law enforcement officials can learn from each other and highlights some of the challenges for the future of automated enforcement on both sides of the Atlantic.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The project will focus on improving the effectiveness of the enforcement of road traffic laws by automating the capture and recording of evidential data at the roadside through the use of camera-based technology. Automated enforcement has a proven impact on road safety by reducing the number and severity of collisions. It also encourages greater compliance with road traffic laws at a time when there are competing demands on law enforcement officials. This paper aims to give a brief comparison of how automated enforcement has been implemented in Europe and in the United States. It looks at both the similarities and differences in deployment and operation. It also explores what, if anything, law enforcement officials can learn from each other and highlights some of the challenges for the future of automated enforcement on both sides of the Atlantic.

Key concepts: Enforcement, Law enforcement, Software deployment, Compliance (psychology), Automation, Business, Computer security, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Future of Automated Enforcement in the United States and Europe – Compare and Contrast — Research Paper | ScholarLens