2012Unpublished venueRequires access

CRCP ME Design Guide

Soojun Ha, Jungheum Yeon, Moon Won

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this Guide, the history of continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) design methods for slab thickness and longitudinal steel reinforcement is reviewed. It is stated that, in general, CRCP design methods evolved from actual experience or field testing based on more mechanistic analysis. However, CRCP is a complicated system with a number of variables interacting with each other. It appears that CRCP design procedures based on mechanistic analysis with empirical performance information, such as the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) or the TxCRCP-ME, will be the primary design program for the foreseeable future. A table is presented describing the current state of practice for CRCP design in selected states. It shows that most states still use the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures for slab thickness design. It also shows that most states determine steel percentages based on experience and use steel amounts between 0.7% and 0.8% except for Texas. In Texas, steel percentage is not as high as in other states. Further discussion in this Guide concerns transverse crack spacing, crack width, load transfer efficiency, and subbase support. The remaining sections of the Guide briefly discuss materials for CRCP and construction of CRCP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this Guide, the history of continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) design methods for slab thickness and longitudinal steel reinforcement is reviewed. It is stated that, in general, CRCP design methods evolved from actual experience or field testing based on more mechanistic analysis. However, CRCP is a complicated system with a number of variables interacting with each other. It appears that CRCP design procedures based on mechanistic analysis with empirical performance information, such as the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) or the TxCRCP-ME, will be the primary design program for the foreseeable future. A table is presented describing the current state of practice for CRCP design in selected states. It shows that most states still use the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures for slab thickness design. It also shows that most states determine steel percentages based on experience and use steel amounts between 0.7% and 0.8% except for Texas. In Texas, steel percentage is not as high as in other states. Further discussion in this Guide concerns transverse crack spacing, crack width, load transfer efficiency, and subbase support. The remaining sections of the Guide briefly discuss materials for CRCP and construction of CRCP.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this Guide, the history of continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) design methods for slab thickness and longitudinal steel reinforcement is reviewed. It is stated that, in general, CRCP design methods evolved from actual experience or field testing based on more mechanistic analysis. However, CRCP is a complicated system with a number of variables interacting with each other. It appears that CRCP design procedures based on mechanistic analysis with empirical performance information, such as the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) or the TxCRCP-ME, will be the primary design program for the foreseeable future. A table is presented describing the current state of practice for CRCP design in selected states. It shows that most states still use the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures for slab thickness design. It also shows that most states determine steel percentages based on experience and use steel amounts between 0.7% and 0.8% except for Texas. In Texas, steel percentage is not as high as in other states. Further discussion in this Guide concerns transverse crack spacing, crack width, load transfer efficiency, and subbase support. The remaining sections of the Guide briefly discuss materials for CRCP and construction of CRCP.

Key concepts: Subbase, Slab, Structural engineering, Engineering, Civil engineering, Forensic engineering, Mathematics, Extension topology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CRCP ME Design Guide — Research Paper | ScholarLens