2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Building a National Freight Policy

Ernie Wittwer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Freight is a growing issue in transportation. Freight tonnage and ton miles are growing more quickly than passenger mileage in many highway corridors. Many freeways are operating under increasingly congested conditions. Railroads are also often operating at or beyond theoretical track capacity. Congestion threatens to harm economic health, particularly in the Midwest, with its heavy reliance on manufacturing and agriculture. But the United States has been slow to respond to this growing challenge. In part the slowness is a factor of the traditional roles of the federal government, the states, and private companies in freight. In part, it may also be related to the fact that little real agreement exists on what a policy should contain. In January of 2007, a survey was sent to 250 observers or participants of an organization made up of the ten states of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’ Mississippi Valley Conference, the Mississippi Valley Freight Coalition. This survey asked for reactions to a number of statements dealing with alternative federal freight transportation policy. The survey results were then used in a workshop made up of state, local, and private sector participants in the freight industry. This paper reviews the results of the survey and of the workshop. It outlines areas of apparent agreement and concerns and suggests future work.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Freight is a growing issue in transportation. Freight tonnage and ton miles are growing more quickly than passenger mileage in many highway corridors. Many freeways are operating under increasingly congested conditions. Railroads are also often operating at or beyond theoretical track capacity. Congestion threatens to harm economic health, particularly in the Midwest, with its heavy reliance on manufacturing and agriculture. But the United States has been slow to respond to this growing challenge. In part the slowness is a factor of the traditional roles of the federal government, the states, and private companies in freight. In part, it may also be related to the fact that little real agreement exists on what a policy should contain. In January of 2007, a survey was sent to 250 observers or participants of an organization made up of the ten states of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’ Mississippi Valley Conference, the Mississippi Valley Freight Coalition. This survey asked for reactions to a number of statements dealing with alternative federal freight transportation policy. The survey results were then used in a workshop made up of state, local, and private sector participants in the freight industry. This paper reviews the results of the survey and of the workshop. It outlines areas of apparent agreement and concerns and suggests future work.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Freight is a growing issue in transportation. Freight tonnage and ton miles are growing more quickly than passenger mileage in many highway corridors. Many freeways are operating under increasingly congested conditions. Railroads are also often operating at or beyond theoretical track capacity. Congestion threatens to harm economic health, particularly in the Midwest, with its heavy reliance on manufacturing and agriculture. But the United States has been slow to respond to this growing challenge. In part the slowness is a factor of the traditional roles of the federal government, the states, and private companies in freight. In part, it may also be related to the fact that little real agreement exists on what a policy should contain. In January of 2007, a survey was sent to 250 observers or participants of an organization made up of the ten states of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’ Mississippi Valley Conference, the Mississippi Valley Freight Coalition. This survey asked for reactions to a number of statements dealing with alternative federal freight transportation policy. The survey results were then used in a workshop made up of state, local, and private sector participants in the freight industry. This paper reviews the results of the survey and of the workshop. It outlines areas of apparent agreement and concerns and suggests future work.

Key concepts: Work (physics), Tonnage, Government (linguistics), Business, State (computer science), Private sector, Transport engineering, Harm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Building a National Freight Policy — Research Paper | ScholarLens