2016Unpublished venueRequires access

The Objectivity of Truth

Hugo Strandberg

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter shows that it is possible to give an account of the concept of truth, and that the call to change and progress. It also explains that to understand Davidson&s;s discussion of the concept of truth, it is helpful to start with his idea of radical interpretation. Radical interpretation is thus a way to shed some light upon communication, upon what is necessary for successful communication. The relation between charity and interpretation is hence not optional, but conceptual, which, in a way, is a rejection of the meaningfulness of the question of why interpretation has to be charitable. The chapter describes that it is important to notice that Davidson&s;s account of the concept of truth means that the predicate is true is not only applicable to empirical beliefs. Massive errors are not possible, so being believed and being true is not completely independent, for enough beliefs must be true in order to give content to the false beliefs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter shows that it is possible to give an account of the concept of truth, and that the call to change and progress. It also explains that to understand Davidson&s;s discussion of the concept of truth, it is helpful to start with his idea of radical interpretation. Radical interpretation is thus a way to shed some light upon communication, upon what is necessary for successful communication. The relation between charity and interpretation is hence not optional, but conceptual, which, in a way, is a rejection of the meaningfulness of the question of why interpretation has to be charitable. The chapter describes that it is important to notice that Davidson&s;s account of the concept of truth means that the predicate is true is not only applicable to empirical beliefs. Massive errors are not possible, so being believed and being true is not completely independent, for enough beliefs must be true in order to give content to the false beliefs.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter shows that it is possible to give an account of the concept of truth, and that the call to change and progress. It also explains that to understand Davidson&s;s discussion of the concept of truth, it is helpful to start with his idea of radical interpretation. Radical interpretation is thus a way to shed some light upon communication, upon what is necessary for successful communication. The relation between charity and interpretation is hence not optional, but conceptual, which, in a way, is a rejection of the meaningfulness of the question of why interpretation has to be charitable. The chapter describes that it is important to notice that Davidson&s;s account of the concept of truth means that the predicate is true is not only applicable to empirical beliefs. Massive errors are not possible, so being believed and being true is not completely independent, for enough beliefs must be true in order to give content to the false beliefs.

Key concepts: Objectivity (philosophy), Epistemology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Objectivity of Truth — Research Paper | ScholarLens