1982•Energy User News; (United States)Requires access

Users blast Con Edison as foe of cogenertion

Richard Pospíšil

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Cogenerators claim that Consolidated Edison (Con Ed) Company's refusal to sell them extra power on demand is hurting the efficiency of their operations. Cogenerators depend on parallel service from the utility because it is difficult to produce electricity and steam in exact amounts. By refusing to buy excess power, Con Ed forces users to produce less than they can use and buy a larger share. Con Ed is challenging the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), which requires utilities to connect with cogenerators and provide parallel service. Utility opposition is based on the high use of diesel fuel and natural gas in New York City, and has developed a rate for standby power that users consider prohibitive. Con Ed also opposes a plan to give natural gas allocation priority to cogenerators. (DCK)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cogenerators claim that Consolidated Edison (Con Ed) Company's refusal to sell them extra power on demand is hurting the efficiency of their operations. Cogenerators depend on parallel service from the utility because it is difficult to produce electricity and steam in exact amounts. By refusing to buy excess power, Con Ed forces users to produce less than they can use and buy a larger share. Con Ed is challenging the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), which requires utilities to connect with cogenerators and provide parallel service. Utility opposition is based on the high use of diesel fuel and natural gas in New York City, and has developed a rate for standby power that users consider prohibitive. Con Ed also opposes a plan to give natural gas allocation priority to cogenerators. (DCK)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cogenerators claim that Consolidated Edison (Con Ed) Company's refusal to sell them extra power on demand is hurting the efficiency of their operations. Cogenerators depend on parallel service from the utility because it is difficult to produce electricity and steam in exact amounts. By refusing to buy excess power, Con Ed forces users to produce less than they can use and buy a larger share. Con Ed is challenging the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), which requires utilities to connect with cogenerators and provide parallel service. Utility opposition is based on the high use of diesel fuel and natural gas in New York City, and has developed a rate for standby power that users consider prohibitive. Con Ed also opposes a plan to give natural gas allocation priority to cogenerators. (DCK)

Key concepts: Electricity, Opposition (politics), Natural gas, Business, Service (business), Environmental economics, Operations management, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Users blast Con Edison as foe of cogenertion — Research Paper | ScholarLens