1980•Journal of the American Society for Horticultural ScienceOpen access

Fibrous Root Distribution of ‘Pineapple’ Orange Trees on Rough Lemon Rootstock at Three Tree Spacings1

William S. Castle

Open full text 33 citations

Abstract

Abstract Fibrous root densities were determined for 16-year-old ‘Pineapple’ orange [ Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb.] trees on rough lemon (C. jambhiri Lush.) rootstock spaced 3.0 × 4.6 m, 4.6 × 6.1 m, and 6.1 × 7.6 m and growing in a deep, central Florida sandy soil. Samples were taken from 1.9 m deep borings at 2 dripline locations and midway between trees in the row and between adjacent rows. The fibrous root systems penetrated to 1.9 m and were well-distributed. Samples from the widest spaced trees generally had lower root densities while the densities of samples from the other spacings were greater and suggested the overlapping of adjacent root systems. Root density was greatest in the surface sample for all spacings and generally decreased with depth. The extensive development and density of the fibrous root systems suggested that root competition was not likely to be a primary limiting factor in higher density plantings grown under comparable conditions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Fibrous root densities were determined for 16-year-old ‘Pineapple’ orange [ Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb.] trees on rough lemon (C. jambhiri Lush.) rootstock spaced 3.0 × 4.6 m, 4.6 × 6.1 m, and 6.1 × 7.6 m and growing in a deep, central Florida sandy soil. Samples were taken from 1.9 m deep borings at 2 dripline locations and midway between trees in the row and between adjacent rows. The fibrous root systems penetrated to 1.9 m and were well-distributed. Samples from the widest spaced trees generally had lower root densities while the densities of samples from the other spacings were greater and suggested the overlapping of adjacent root systems. Root density was greatest in the surface sample for all spacings and generally decreased with depth. The extensive development and density of the fibrous root systems suggested that root competition was not likely to be a primary limiting factor in higher density plantings grown under comparable conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Fibrous root densities were determined for 16-year-old ‘Pineapple’ orange [ Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb.] trees on rough lemon (C. jambhiri Lush.) rootstock spaced 3.0 × 4.6 m, 4.6 × 6.1 m, and 6.1 × 7.6 m and growing in a deep, central Florida sandy soil. Samples were taken from 1.9 m deep borings at 2 dripline locations and midway between trees in the row and between adjacent rows. The fibrous root systems penetrated to 1.9 m and were well-distributed. Samples from the widest spaced trees generally had lower root densities while the densities of samples from the other spacings were greater and suggested the overlapping of adjacent root systems. Root density was greatest in the surface sample for all spacings and generally decreased with depth. The extensive development and density of the fibrous root systems suggested that root competition was not likely to be a primary limiting factor in higher density plantings grown under comparable conditions.

Key concepts: Rootstock, Fibrous root system, Orange (colour), Root system, Horticulture, Rough lemon, Botany, Taproot

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fibrous Root Distribution of ‘Pineapple’ Orange Trees on Rough Lemon Rootstock at Three Tree Spacings1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens