1973UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)Requires access

Snowfall interception in Arizona ponderosa pine forests.

Larry C. Tennyson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The behavior of intercepted snow on a stand of uneven-aged ponderosa pine in east-central Arizona was evaluated, with the use of a super 8-mm time-lapse movie camera, to determine the relative significance of snowfall interception in the water yield of this type forest. A snow load index was developed to estimate interception storage for two trees in the field of view for discrete time periods. The snow load index, photographs, and climatic data were combined to evaluate accumulation and to identify and rank according to relative magnitudes the basic processes of canopy snow removal. The rate of snow accumulation, which was nonlinear, appeared to be a function of climatic conditions, the rate of incoming precipitation, and the density of crown foilage. Snowslide appeared to be the dominant process of canopy snow removal during the study period, with melt, wind erosion, evaporation of meltwater, and sublimation of canopy snow occurring in order of decreasing significance. Most of the intercepted snow reached the snowpack on the ground, representing no significant loss to the water budget on site. Some water apparently was lost because of evaporation and sublimation but these losses appeared to be comparatively minor.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The behavior of intercepted snow on a stand of uneven-aged ponderosa pine in east-central Arizona was evaluated, with the use of a super 8-mm time-lapse movie camera, to determine the relative significance of snowfall interception in the water yield of this type forest. A snow load index was developed to estimate interception storage for two trees in the field of view for discrete time periods. The snow load index, photographs, and climatic data were combined to evaluate accumulation and to identify and rank according to relative magnitudes the basic processes of canopy snow removal. The rate of snow accumulation, which was nonlinear, appeared to be a function of climatic conditions, the rate of incoming precipitation, and the density of crown foilage. Snowslide appeared to be the dominant process of canopy snow removal during the study period, with melt, wind erosion, evaporation of meltwater, and sublimation of canopy snow occurring in order of decreasing significance. Most of the intercepted snow reached the snowpack on the ground, representing no significant loss to the water budget on site. Some water apparently was lost because of evaporation and sublimation but these losses appeared to be comparatively minor.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The behavior of intercepted snow on a stand of uneven-aged ponderosa pine in east-central Arizona was evaluated, with the use of a super 8-mm time-lapse movie camera, to determine the relative significance of snowfall interception in the water yield of this type forest. A snow load index was developed to estimate interception storage for two trees in the field of view for discrete time periods. The snow load index, photographs, and climatic data were combined to evaluate accumulation and to identify and rank according to relative magnitudes the basic processes of canopy snow removal. The rate of snow accumulation, which was nonlinear, appeared to be a function of climatic conditions, the rate of incoming precipitation, and the density of crown foilage. Snowslide appeared to be the dominant process of canopy snow removal during the study period, with melt, wind erosion, evaporation of meltwater, and sublimation of canopy snow occurring in order of decreasing significance. Most of the intercepted snow reached the snowpack on the ground, representing no significant loss to the water budget on site. Some water apparently was lost because of evaporation and sublimation but these losses appeared to be comparatively minor.

Key concepts: Interception, Snow, Forestry, Environmental science, Pine forest, Pinus <genus>, Geography, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Snowfall interception in Arizona ponderosa pine forests. — Research Paper | ScholarLens