1997Unpublished venueRequires access

BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ALTERNATIVE FOR LOW VOLUME ROADS

F W Klaiber, T J Wipf, Brent Phares

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In Iowa there are over 20,000 bridges on the secondary system. The majority of these bridges are the responsibility of the local county engineers. As county engineers have limited budgets, in many counties the engineers design and construct their own short span bridges with their own labor forces. The primary objective of this research is to perform laboratory testing on two bridge alternatives (Concept 1 and Concept 2) that counties can design and construct with their own crews. Concept 1 involves the fabrication of precast units which consist of steel beams connected compositely with a concrete deck. Deck thickness is limited so that the units can be lifted and transported to the field where several of these units can be connected and the remaining portion of the deck placed. Concept 2 involves testing and modifying a system of steel beams with concrete fill between them that has been used by several Iowa counties on low water stream crossings for 20 pIus years. There is no reinforcing steel in this system or connection between the steel beams and the concrete. Due to page restrictions, only Concept 1 is presented in this paper. For the covering abstract see ITRD E111699.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Iowa there are over 20,000 bridges on the secondary system. The majority of these bridges are the responsibility of the local county engineers. As county engineers have limited budgets, in many counties the engineers design and construct their own short span bridges with their own labor forces. The primary objective of this research is to perform laboratory testing on two bridge alternatives (Concept 1 and Concept 2) that counties can design and construct with their own crews. Concept 1 involves the fabrication of precast units which consist of steel beams connected compositely with a concrete deck. Deck thickness is limited so that the units can be lifted and transported to the field where several of these units can be connected and the remaining portion of the deck placed. Concept 2 involves testing and modifying a system of steel beams with concrete fill between them that has been used by several Iowa counties on low water stream crossings for 20 pIus years. There is no reinforcing steel in this system or connection between the steel beams and the concrete. Due to page restrictions, only Concept 1 is presented in this paper. For the covering abstract see ITRD E111699.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Iowa there are over 20,000 bridges on the secondary system. The majority of these bridges are the responsibility of the local county engineers. As county engineers have limited budgets, in many counties the engineers design and construct their own short span bridges with their own labor forces. The primary objective of this research is to perform laboratory testing on two bridge alternatives (Concept 1 and Concept 2) that counties can design and construct with their own crews. Concept 1 involves the fabrication of precast units which consist of steel beams connected compositely with a concrete deck. Deck thickness is limited so that the units can be lifted and transported to the field where several of these units can be connected and the remaining portion of the deck placed. Concept 2 involves testing and modifying a system of steel beams with concrete fill between them that has been used by several Iowa counties on low water stream crossings for 20 pIus years. There is no reinforcing steel in this system or connection between the steel beams and the concrete. Due to page restrictions, only Concept 1 is presented in this paper. For the covering abstract see ITRD E111699.

Key concepts: Precast concrete, Deck, Bridge deck, Bridge (graph theory), Engineering, Span (engineering), Civil engineering, Construct (python library)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ALTERNATIVE FOR LOW VOLUME ROADS — Research Paper | ScholarLens