1982Unpublished venueRequires access

ENFORCEMENT OF PRIORITY TREATMENT FOR BUSES ON URBAN STREETS

John J. Roark

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Priority treatment for buses on urban streets generally involves the use of buses on arterial facilities that have limited access from abutting property and permit off-peak turning movements. Enforcement becomes a major consideration when other roadway functions are restricted in favor of the bus. Project design must recognize the importance as well as the expense of enforcement, and incorporate features in the design to encourage self enforcement. Design guidelines are presented for (a) concurrent-flow bus lanes, (b) contraflow bus lanes, (c) bus-only and automobile-restricted zones, and (d) signal preemption. However, project design cannot substitute for a total program of enforcement, which includes extensive coordination and cooperation among the agencies involved in planning, designing, operating and enforcing the project, public education programs, use of traditional and nontraditional enforcement techniques, and establishment of adequate penalties for violators. (Author)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Priority treatment for buses on urban streets generally involves the use of buses on arterial facilities that have limited access from abutting property and permit off-peak turning movements. Enforcement becomes a major consideration when other roadway functions are restricted in favor of the bus. Project design must recognize the importance as well as the expense of enforcement, and incorporate features in the design to encourage self enforcement. Design guidelines are presented for (a) concurrent-flow bus lanes, (b) contraflow bus lanes, (c) bus-only and automobile-restricted zones, and (d) signal preemption. However, project design cannot substitute for a total program of enforcement, which includes extensive coordination and cooperation among the agencies involved in planning, designing, operating and enforcing the project, public education programs, use of traditional and nontraditional enforcement techniques, and establishment of adequate penalties for violators. (Author)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Priority treatment for buses on urban streets generally involves the use of buses on arterial facilities that have limited access from abutting property and permit off-peak turning movements. Enforcement becomes a major consideration when other roadway functions are restricted in favor of the bus. Project design must recognize the importance as well as the expense of enforcement, and incorporate features in the design to encourage self enforcement. Design guidelines are presented for (a) concurrent-flow bus lanes, (b) contraflow bus lanes, (c) bus-only and automobile-restricted zones, and (d) signal preemption. However, project design cannot substitute for a total program of enforcement, which includes extensive coordination and cooperation among the agencies involved in planning, designing, operating and enforcing the project, public education programs, use of traditional and nontraditional enforcement techniques, and establishment of adequate penalties for violators. (Author)

Key concepts: Enforcement, Preemption, Transport engineering, Law enforcement, Business, Engineering, Computer security, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ENFORCEMENT OF PRIORITY TREATMENT FOR BUSES ON URBAN STREETS — Research Paper | ScholarLens