ScholarLens Back to search
2012•Otago law reviewRequires access

The Fool's Law or the Law's Fool? : Common Law Perspectives and Swedish Experiences on the Matter of Mistake as an Excuse from Criminal Liability

Dennis Martinsson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Fool's Law or the Law's Fool? : Common Law Perspectives and Swedish Experiences on the Matter of Mistake as an Excuse from Criminal Liability

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Fool's Law or the Law's Fool? : Common Law Perspectives and Swedish Experiences on the Matter of Mistake as an Excuse from Criminal Liability

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Fool's Law or the Law's Fool? : Common Law Perspectives and Swedish Experiences on the Matter of Mistake as an Excuse from Criminal Liability

Key concepts: Excuse, Mistake, Law, Criminal law, Political science, Liability

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Fool's Law or the Law's Fool? : Common Law Perspectives and Swedish Experiences on the Matter of Mistake as an Excuse from Criminal Liability — Research Paper | ScholarLens