1980Unpublished venueRequires access

Catalytic conversion of gas to liquid fuels

Tom Mole, Kerry C. Pratt

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The major energy related problem in Australia in the 1980s and 1990s will be a shortage of liquid fuels. Coal, oil shale, biomass, natural gas and condensates appear to be the most likely sources of substitute liquid fuels in Australia in the post crude oil era. At present, the direct conversion of natural gas (methane) to liquid products seems unlikely to be a commercial possibility. Therefore in the foreseeable future, fischer tropsch synthesis, and methanol production via synthesis gas seem the only alternatives. The mobil methanol to gasoline process employing the shape selective zsm catalysts is promising new technology, and in our view represents the most likely route to be employed in the coming decades. The zsm catalyst however, might be successfully employed to improve the product selectivity in fischer tropsch synthesis. There are options for using methanol derived from natural gas in other ways. There is a possibility that developments along the zsm line may in part replace the separate cracking and reforming catalysts, and so methanol might be coprocessed with other petroleum fractions in future refineries. In addition, methanol might be coprocessed as a source of hydrogen in the processing of coal or shale derived materials, thereby eliminating the need for costly hydrogen compression. Thermal cracking of lpg could provide a source of light olefins, which might themselves be converted to hydrocarbon liquids.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The major energy related problem in Australia in the 1980s and 1990s will be a shortage of liquid fuels. Coal, oil shale, biomass, natural gas and condensates appear to be the most likely sources of substitute liquid fuels in Australia in the post crude oil era. At present, the direct conversion of natural gas (methane) to liquid products seems unlikely to be a commercial possibility. Therefore in the foreseeable future, fischer tropsch synthesis, and methanol production via synthesis gas seem the only alternatives. The mobil methanol to gasoline process employing the shape selective zsm catalysts is promising new technology, and in our view represents the most likely route to be employed in the coming decades. The zsm catalyst however, might be successfully employed to improve the product selectivity in fischer tropsch synthesis. There are options for using methanol derived from natural gas in other ways. There is a possibility that developments along the zsm line may in part replace the separate cracking and reforming catalysts, and so methanol might be coprocessed with other petroleum fractions in future refineries. In addition, methanol might be coprocessed as a source of hydrogen in the processing of coal or shale derived materials, thereby eliminating the need for costly hydrogen compression. Thermal cracking of lpg could provide a source of light olefins, which might themselves be converted to hydrocarbon liquids.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The major energy related problem in Australia in the 1980s and 1990s will be a shortage of liquid fuels. Coal, oil shale, biomass, natural gas and condensates appear to be the most likely sources of substitute liquid fuels in Australia in the post crude oil era. At present, the direct conversion of natural gas (methane) to liquid products seems unlikely to be a commercial possibility. Therefore in the foreseeable future, fischer tropsch synthesis, and methanol production via synthesis gas seem the only alternatives. The mobil methanol to gasoline process employing the shape selective zsm catalysts is promising new technology, and in our view represents the most likely route to be employed in the coming decades. The zsm catalyst however, might be successfully employed to improve the product selectivity in fischer tropsch synthesis. There are options for using methanol derived from natural gas in other ways. There is a possibility that developments along the zsm line may in part replace the separate cracking and reforming catalysts, and so methanol might be coprocessed with other petroleum fractions in future refineries. In addition, methanol might be coprocessed as a source of hydrogen in the processing of coal or shale derived materials, thereby eliminating the need for costly hydrogen compression. Thermal cracking of lpg could provide a source of light olefins, which might themselves be converted to hydrocarbon liquids.

Key concepts: Natural gas, Waste management, Synthetic fuel, Fischer–Tropsch process, Syngas, Methanol, Liquid fuel, Coal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Catalytic conversion of gas to liquid fuels — Research Paper | ScholarLens