1986•University of Pennsylvania Press eBooksRequires access

3. From Hermeneutics to Praxis

Richard J. Bernstein

Open publisher page 53 citations

Abstract

V/ne of the most important and central claims in Hans-George Gad amer's philosophical hermeneutics is that all understanding involves not only interpretation, but also application. Against an older tradi tion that divided up hermeneutics into subtilitas intelligendi (under standing), subtilitas explicandi (interpretation), and subtilitas appli candi (application), a primary thesis of Truth and Method is that these are not three independent activities to be relegated to different sub-disciplines, but rather they are internally related. They are all moments of the single process of understanding. I want to explore this integration of the moment of application into hermeneutic under standing which Gadamer calls the rediscovery of the fundamental hermeneutic problem.1 For it not only takes us to the heart of what is distinctive about philosophical hermeneutics but it reveals some of the deep problems and tensions implicit in hermeneutics. First, I want to note some of the central features of what Gadamer means by philo sophical hermeneutics. Then I can specify the problem that he is confronting when dealing with application. This will enable us to see what Gadamer seeks to appropriate from Aristotle, and especially

About this research paper

What this paper is about

V/ne of the most important and central claims in Hans-George Gad amer's philosophical hermeneutics is that all understanding involves not only interpretation, but also application. Against an older tradi tion that divided up hermeneutics into subtilitas intelligendi (under standing), subtilitas explicandi (interpretation), and subtilitas appli candi (application), a primary thesis of Truth and Method is that these are not three independent activities to be relegated to different sub-disciplines, but rather they are internally related. They are all moments of the single process of understanding. I want to explore this integration of the moment of application into hermeneutic under standing which Gadamer calls the rediscovery of the fundamental hermeneutic problem.1 For it not only takes us to the heart of what is distinctive about philosophical hermeneutics but it reveals some of the deep problems and tensions implicit in hermeneutics. First, I want to note some of the central features of what Gadamer means by philo sophical hermeneutics. Then I can specify the problem that he is confronting when dealing with application. This will enable us to see what Gadamer seeks to appropriate from Aristotle, and especially

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

V/ne of the most important and central claims in Hans-George Gad amer's philosophical hermeneutics is that all understanding involves not only interpretation, but also application. Against an older tradi tion that divided up hermeneutics into subtilitas intelligendi (under standing), subtilitas explicandi (interpretation), and subtilitas appli candi (application), a primary thesis of Truth and Method is that these are not three independent activities to be relegated to different sub-disciplines, but rather they are internally related. They are all moments of the single process of understanding. I want to explore this integration of the moment of application into hermeneutic under standing which Gadamer calls the rediscovery of the fundamental hermeneutic problem.1 For it not only takes us to the heart of what is distinctive about philosophical hermeneutics but it reveals some of the deep problems and tensions implicit in hermeneutics. First, I want to note some of the central features of what Gadamer means by philo sophical hermeneutics. Then I can specify the problem that he is confronting when dealing with application. This will enable us to see what Gadamer seeks to appropriate from Aristotle, and especially

Key concepts: Hermeneutics, Praxis, Philosophy, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
3. From Hermeneutics to Praxis — Research Paper | ScholarLens