1990PubMedRequires access

[The site of recurrent ulcer following stomach surgery (Billroth I and II)].

G Bretzke, Alan F. List

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In 69 patients with recidivation ulcer after an operation of the stomach (51 times Billroth II and 18 times Billroth I) was investigated whether or not there are differences in the localisation of an ulcer. In patients operated on according to Billroth II ulcers of the anastomoses are dominating, whereas in patients operated on according to Billroth I the majority of ulcers is to be found in the residual stomach. The causes for the deviating distribution pattern are not unequivocal. Changed diagnostics (in the first place endoscopy), different effect of the bile reflux, differing colonisation with Campylobacter pylori and differences in the size of the resection are discussed. The free interval between operation and recidivation of ulcer is distinctly shorter in Billroth I patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 69 patients with recidivation ulcer after an operation of the stomach (51 times Billroth II and 18 times Billroth I) was investigated whether or not there are differences in the localisation of an ulcer. In patients operated on according to Billroth II ulcers of the anastomoses are dominating, whereas in patients operated on according to Billroth I the majority of ulcers is to be found in the residual stomach. The causes for the deviating distribution pattern are not unequivocal. Changed diagnostics (in the first place endoscopy), different effect of the bile reflux, differing colonisation with Campylobacter pylori and differences in the size of the resection are discussed. The free interval between operation and recidivation of ulcer is distinctly shorter in Billroth I patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 69 patients with recidivation ulcer after an operation of the stomach (51 times Billroth II and 18 times Billroth I) was investigated whether or not there are differences in the localisation of an ulcer. In patients operated on according to Billroth II ulcers of the anastomoses are dominating, whereas in patients operated on according to Billroth I the majority of ulcers is to be found in the residual stomach. The causes for the deviating distribution pattern are not unequivocal. Changed diagnostics (in the first place endoscopy), different effect of the bile reflux, differing colonisation with Campylobacter pylori and differences in the size of the resection are discussed. The free interval between operation and recidivation of ulcer is distinctly shorter in Billroth I patients.

Key concepts: Billroth I, Billroth II, Medicine, Anastomosis, Stomach, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Gastroenterostomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The site of recurrent ulcer following stomach surgery (Billroth I and II)]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens