It is hard to agree on a spanning tree
Andreas Darmann
Abstract
Open-access reader
Andreas Darmann
Abstract
Open-access reader
We consider the problem of finding a "fair" or "acceptable" spanning tree in an undirected graph when each member of a group of agents proposes a spanning tree. An "acceptable" spanning tree in that respect is a spanning tree which does not differ in more than a given number of edges from each of the single proposals. We show that, from a computational perspective, determining if such a spanning tree exists is a difficult (NP-complete) problem.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We consider the problem of finding a "fair" or "acceptable" spanning tree in an undirected graph when each member of a group of agents proposes a spanning tree. An "acceptable" spanning tree in that respect is a spanning tree which does not differ in more than a given number of edges from each of the single proposals. We show that, from a computational perspective, determining if such a spanning tree exists is a difficult (NP-complete) problem.
Key concepts: Spanning tree, Distributed minimum spanning tree, Minimum spanning tree, k-minimum spanning tree, Connected dominating set, Combinatorics, Minimum degree spanning tree, Euclidean minimum spanning tree