PARKING POLICIES AND COMMUTER CAR SHARING
Mark Haseley
Abstract
Mark Haseley
Abstract
This paper presents a study designed to establish the potential for journey-to-work car sharing, at a workplace where staff would be offered discriminatory parking places as incentives. If employers in urban areas widely adopted such an initiative, it would offer the potential to reduce: (1) traffic flows in urban areas; (2) employees' travel costs; and (3) the demand for parking spaces at a workplace. A survey of the staff of the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, was conducted as a case study of the feasibility of such a workplace initiative. The paper describes the background to the study, the methods used, and the main findings. The University provides just over 900 on-campus parking spaces for its staff, but it issued 2040 parking permits for the academic year 1993-94. With a few special exceptions (e.g. registered disabled drivers), access to parking is first come, first served. As it was not feasible to increase the number of parking spaces, two possible car-sharing policies were investigated: (1) reserved spaces for car-sharers; and (2) permit price discrimination in favour of car-sharers. Staff were surveyed to determine their attitudes to these schemes. The survey's results indicated staff reluctance to share cars, and unlikeliness to share cars in the event of a discriminatory policy.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper presents a study designed to establish the potential for journey-to-work car sharing, at a workplace where staff would be offered discriminatory parking places as incentives. If employers in urban areas widely adopted such an initiative, it would offer the potential to reduce: (1) traffic flows in urban areas; (2) employees' travel costs; and (3) the demand for parking spaces at a workplace. A survey of the staff of the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, was conducted as a case study of the feasibility of such a workplace initiative. The paper describes the background to the study, the methods used, and the main findings. The University provides just over 900 on-campus parking spaces for its staff, but it issued 2040 parking permits for the academic year 1993-94. With a few special exceptions (e.g. registered disabled drivers), access to parking is first come, first served. As it was not feasible to increase the number of parking spaces, two possible car-sharing policies were investigated: (1) reserved spaces for car-sharers; and (2) permit price discrimination in favour of car-sharers. Staff were surveyed to determine their attitudes to these schemes. The survey's results indicated staff reluctance to share cars, and unlikeliness to share cars in the event of a discriminatory policy.
Key concepts: Incentive, Work (physics), Business, Transport engineering, Marketing, Engineering, Economics, Mechanical engineering