1996PARKING NEWSRequires access

PARKING POLICIES AND COMMUTER CAR SHARING

Mark Haseley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a study designed to establish the potential for journey-to-work car sharing, at a workplace where staff would be offered discriminatory parking places as incentives. If employers in urban areas widely adopted such an initiative, it would offer the potential to reduce: (1) traffic flows in urban areas; (2) employees' travel costs; and (3) the demand for parking spaces at a workplace. A survey of the staff of the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, was conducted as a case study of the feasibility of such a workplace initiative. The paper describes the background to the study, the methods used, and the main findings. The University provides just over 900 on-campus parking spaces for its staff, but it issued 2040 parking permits for the academic year 1993-94. With a few special exceptions (e.g. registered disabled drivers), access to parking is first come, first served. As it was not feasible to increase the number of parking spaces, two possible car-sharing policies were investigated: (1) reserved spaces for car-sharers; and (2) permit price discrimination in favour of car-sharers. Staff were surveyed to determine their attitudes to these schemes. The survey's results indicated staff reluctance to share cars, and unlikeliness to share cars in the event of a discriminatory policy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents a study designed to establish the potential for journey-to-work car sharing, at a workplace where staff would be offered discriminatory parking places as incentives. If employers in urban areas widely adopted such an initiative, it would offer the potential to reduce: (1) traffic flows in urban areas; (2) employees' travel costs; and (3) the demand for parking spaces at a workplace. A survey of the staff of the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, was conducted as a case study of the feasibility of such a workplace initiative. The paper describes the background to the study, the methods used, and the main findings. The University provides just over 900 on-campus parking spaces for its staff, but it issued 2040 parking permits for the academic year 1993-94. With a few special exceptions (e.g. registered disabled drivers), access to parking is first come, first served. As it was not feasible to increase the number of parking spaces, two possible car-sharing policies were investigated: (1) reserved spaces for car-sharers; and (2) permit price discrimination in favour of car-sharers. Staff were surveyed to determine their attitudes to these schemes. The survey's results indicated staff reluctance to share cars, and unlikeliness to share cars in the event of a discriminatory policy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents a study designed to establish the potential for journey-to-work car sharing, at a workplace where staff would be offered discriminatory parking places as incentives. If employers in urban areas widely adopted such an initiative, it would offer the potential to reduce: (1) traffic flows in urban areas; (2) employees' travel costs; and (3) the demand for parking spaces at a workplace. A survey of the staff of the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, was conducted as a case study of the feasibility of such a workplace initiative. The paper describes the background to the study, the methods used, and the main findings. The University provides just over 900 on-campus parking spaces for its staff, but it issued 2040 parking permits for the academic year 1993-94. With a few special exceptions (e.g. registered disabled drivers), access to parking is first come, first served. As it was not feasible to increase the number of parking spaces, two possible car-sharing policies were investigated: (1) reserved spaces for car-sharers; and (2) permit price discrimination in favour of car-sharers. Staff were surveyed to determine their attitudes to these schemes. The survey's results indicated staff reluctance to share cars, and unlikeliness to share cars in the event of a discriminatory policy.

Key concepts: Incentive, Work (physics), Business, Transport engineering, Marketing, Engineering, Economics, Mechanical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PARKING POLICIES AND COMMUTER CAR SHARING — Research Paper | ScholarLens