1984Planning & Transport Res & Comp, Sum Ann Mtg, ProcRequires access

LOCAL TRANSPORT PROJECT EVALUATION AND NATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY

P B Goodwin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There is a well established body of practice on how to evaluate the transport costs and benefits of transport projects -for example, congestion, accidents, petrol consumption, etc. Some consideration has also been given to a broader issue of economics, namely the possible effect of transport investment on industrial costs and hence on economic activity: studies suggest that the effect is small or undetectable. It may be that a different macro economic aspect is much more important, ie, the impact of and on national economic policy concerning public expenditure and unemployment. The question is, should such factors be included formally in the evaluation framework, and if so, how? One view is that all such aspects should be ignored, as outside the scope of technical competence and authority of transport bodies. Another is that to ignore such factors makes transport decision making ivory towered and irrelevant. A case study is discussed, where operating cost savings lead to higher unemployment expenditure and a pattern of costs and benefits falling on different authorities for the covering abstract of the seminar see TRIS 451949. (TRRL)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is a well established body of practice on how to evaluate the transport costs and benefits of transport projects -for example, congestion, accidents, petrol consumption, etc. Some consideration has also been given to a broader issue of economics, namely the possible effect of transport investment on industrial costs and hence on economic activity: studies suggest that the effect is small or undetectable. It may be that a different macro economic aspect is much more important, ie, the impact of and on national economic policy concerning public expenditure and unemployment. The question is, should such factors be included formally in the evaluation framework, and if so, how? One view is that all such aspects should be ignored, as outside the scope of technical competence and authority of transport bodies. Another is that to ignore such factors makes transport decision making ivory towered and irrelevant. A case study is discussed, where operating cost savings lead to higher unemployment expenditure and a pattern of costs and benefits falling on different authorities for the covering abstract of the seminar see TRIS 451949. (TRRL)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is a well established body of practice on how to evaluate the transport costs and benefits of transport projects -for example, congestion, accidents, petrol consumption, etc. Some consideration has also been given to a broader issue of economics, namely the possible effect of transport investment on industrial costs and hence on economic activity: studies suggest that the effect is small or undetectable. It may be that a different macro economic aspect is much more important, ie, the impact of and on national economic policy concerning public expenditure and unemployment. The question is, should such factors be included formally in the evaluation framework, and if so, how? One view is that all such aspects should be ignored, as outside the scope of technical competence and authority of transport bodies. Another is that to ignore such factors makes transport decision making ivory towered and irrelevant. A case study is discussed, where operating cost savings lead to higher unemployment expenditure and a pattern of costs and benefits falling on different authorities for the covering abstract of the seminar see TRIS 451949. (TRRL)

Key concepts: Public economics, Public transport, Economics, Investment (military), Unemployment, Scope (computer science), Consumption (sociology), Economic impact analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LOCAL TRANSPORT PROJECT EVALUATION AND NATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY — Research Paper | ScholarLens