1979Unpublished venueRequires access

Local street management - some observations on implementation problems

R E Brindle

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There are widely divergent attitudes within the community to the measures being proposed to control inappropriate traffic behaviour in residential areas. The results of a survey of Australian application of the techniques available are presented. Three cases in Melbourne are outlined to highlight how the existing context, the motivation for change, and the nature of prior planning can affect the outcome. Three common problems are identified and discussed: lack of clear objectives; the different values placed on safety, amenity and access; and the involvement of various sectors of the community in the decision. It is concluded that the full range of management measures should be used, not just street closures; the local community must perceive the advantages of the program; it is advisable to act in advance of traffic problems; and an agreed road classification must first be established. (A)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are widely divergent attitudes within the community to the measures being proposed to control inappropriate traffic behaviour in residential areas. The results of a survey of Australian application of the techniques available are presented. Three cases in Melbourne are outlined to highlight how the existing context, the motivation for change, and the nature of prior planning can affect the outcome. Three common problems are identified and discussed: lack of clear objectives; the different values placed on safety, amenity and access; and the involvement of various sectors of the community in the decision. It is concluded that the full range of management measures should be used, not just street closures; the local community must perceive the advantages of the program; it is advisable to act in advance of traffic problems; and an agreed road classification must first be established. (A)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are widely divergent attitudes within the community to the measures being proposed to control inappropriate traffic behaviour in residential areas. The results of a survey of Australian application of the techniques available are presented. Three cases in Melbourne are outlined to highlight how the existing context, the motivation for change, and the nature of prior planning can affect the outcome. Three common problems are identified and discussed: lack of clear objectives; the different values placed on safety, amenity and access; and the involvement of various sectors of the community in the decision. It is concluded that the full range of management measures should be used, not just street closures; the local community must perceive the advantages of the program; it is advisable to act in advance of traffic problems; and an agreed road classification must first be established. (A)

Key concepts: Amenity, Context (archaeology), Control (management), Transport engineering, Business, Environmental planning, Affect (linguistics), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Local street management - some observations on implementation problems — Research Paper | ScholarLens