1994PubMedRequires access

[Determination of serum metanephrines in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma].

Mirca Marini, Marc Fathi, M. B. Vallotton

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

Presently, the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma rests upon the determination of urinary catecholamines, and specially metanephrines which offer 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity. The 24 hours urine collection is problematic for practical reasons and patient compliance. Serum metanephrines determination by HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) avoids these difficulties making the investigation easier. We report the results of serum metanephrine (MN) and normetanephrine (NMN) in 10 patients presenting with a pheochromocytoma histologically confirmed and without renal insufficiency, compared to 18 control healthy subjects, 33 patients suffering from hypertension and 11 patients with terminal renal failure on haemodialysis. The mean value of total metanephrines (MN + NMN) for the patients presenting with a pheochromocytoma is 326 +/- 206 nmol/l (range 76 to 718). In the control group without hypertension this value is 6.8 +/- 2.9 nmol/l (range 0.5 to 10.7) and for the control group with hypertension 25 +/- 27 nmol/l (range 7 to 138). For the patients with renal failure, the mean value is 471 +/- 201 nmol/l (range 188 to 920). Thus total metanephrines serum level values were found higher in the patients with a pheochromocytoma than in those with or without hypertension, but they were not discriminatory when the cases of renal insufficiency were included. CONCLUSION In case of a normal renal function, serum metanephrines determination for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma gives, above a threshold value of 50 nmol/l, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Presently, the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma rests upon the determination of urinary catecholamines, and specially metanephrines which offer 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity. The 24 hours urine collection is problematic for practical reasons and patient compliance. Serum metanephrines determination by HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) avoids these difficulties making the investigation easier. We report the results of serum metanephrine (MN) and normetanephrine (NMN) in 10 patients presenting with a pheochromocytoma histologically confirmed and without renal insufficiency, compared to 18 control healthy subjects, 33 patients suffering from hypertension and 11 patients with terminal renal failure on haemodialysis. The mean value of total metanephrines (MN + NMN) for the patients presenting with a pheochromocytoma is 326 +/- 206 nmol/l (range 76 to 718). In the control group without hypertension this value is 6.8 +/- 2.9 nmol/l (range 0.5 to 10.7) and for the control group with hypertension 25 +/- 27 nmol/l (range 7 to 138). For the patients with renal failure, the mean value is 471 +/- 201 nmol/l (range 188 to 920). Thus total metanephrines serum level values were found higher in the patients with a pheochromocytoma than in those with or without hypertension, but they were not discriminatory when the cases of renal insufficiency were included. CONCLUSION In case of a normal renal function, serum metanephrines determination for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma gives, above a threshold value of 50 nmol/l, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94%.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Presently, the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma rests upon the determination of urinary catecholamines, and specially metanephrines which offer 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity. The 24 hours urine collection is problematic for practical reasons and patient compliance. Serum metanephrines determination by HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) avoids these difficulties making the investigation easier. We report the results of serum metanephrine (MN) and normetanephrine (NMN) in 10 patients presenting with a pheochromocytoma histologically confirmed and without renal insufficiency, compared to 18 control healthy subjects, 33 patients suffering from hypertension and 11 patients with terminal renal failure on haemodialysis. The mean value of total metanephrines (MN + NMN) for the patients presenting with a pheochromocytoma is 326 +/- 206 nmol/l (range 76 to 718). In the control group without hypertension this value is 6.8 +/- 2.9 nmol/l (range 0.5 to 10.7) and for the control group with hypertension 25 +/- 27 nmol/l (range 7 to 138). For the patients with renal failure, the mean value is 471 +/- 201 nmol/l (range 188 to 920). Thus total metanephrines serum level values were found higher in the patients with a pheochromocytoma than in those with or without hypertension, but they were not discriminatory when the cases of renal insufficiency were included. CONCLUSION In case of a normal renal function, serum metanephrines determination for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma gives, above a threshold value of 50 nmol/l, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94%.

Key concepts: Metanephrines, Normetanephrine, Pheochromocytoma, Metanephrine, Urology, Medicine, Urinary system, Urine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Determination of serum metanephrines in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens