2004Unpublished venueRequires access

Improved side impact protection for Australian child occupants

Julie Brown, Marianne Huot, Patrick J. Kelly, Lynne E. Bilston

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

While frontal crashes are the most common types of collisions in Australia (and elsewhere), side impact crashes often account for a greater proportion of serious and fatal injuries. This is true for both adult and child occupants. In recent years vehicle designers have made significant enhancements to crash protection systems that will provide increased levels of protection to adult occupants. However, little international attention has been focussed on the design of child restraint systems that provide improved side impact protection. This paper presents the results from a comprehensive series of simulated side impacts. These results demonstrate both the scope for improving child occupant protection and how easily significant increases in the level of protection can be achieved through attention to anchorages, padding and side structure geometry. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E211985.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While frontal crashes are the most common types of collisions in Australia (and elsewhere), side impact crashes often account for a greater proportion of serious and fatal injuries. This is true for both adult and child occupants. In recent years vehicle designers have made significant enhancements to crash protection systems that will provide increased levels of protection to adult occupants. However, little international attention has been focussed on the design of child restraint systems that provide improved side impact protection. This paper presents the results from a comprehensive series of simulated side impacts. These results demonstrate both the scope for improving child occupant protection and how easily significant increases in the level of protection can be achieved through attention to anchorages, padding and side structure geometry. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E211985.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While frontal crashes are the most common types of collisions in Australia (and elsewhere), side impact crashes often account for a greater proportion of serious and fatal injuries. This is true for both adult and child occupants. In recent years vehicle designers have made significant enhancements to crash protection systems that will provide increased levels of protection to adult occupants. However, little international attention has been focussed on the design of child restraint systems that provide improved side impact protection. This paper presents the results from a comprehensive series of simulated side impacts. These results demonstrate both the scope for improving child occupant protection and how easily significant increases in the level of protection can be achieved through attention to anchorages, padding and side structure geometry. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E211985.

Key concepts: Side impact, Scope (computer science), Child protection, Crash, Engineering, Forensic engineering, Computer science, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Improved side impact protection for Australian child occupants — Research Paper | ScholarLens