MAINTAINING THE BALANCE: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PARTNERSHIPS IN ISTEA AND BEYOND
W Constable
Abstract
W Constable
Abstract
The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 greatly enhanced the cooperative efforts of federal, state, and local officials in the metropolitan transportation planning process. By granting increased responsibility to the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), ISTEA expanded the partnership approach to directing the investment of federal highway and transit dollars in many regions of the nation. The bill's enactment reinforced the long-standing 3C's of cooperation, collaboration, and consensus building by providing broader participation in transportation decision-making. Since the passage of ISTEA, MPO partnerships have been tested and scrutinized against the backdrop of the metropolitan transportation planning and investment process. In some cases, the institutional arrangements of particular MPOs have not allowed for the increased participation called for in ISTEA. In a number of areas, the dissatisfaction of partners and stakeholders reflects a consequence of limited funding - a scenario that is not likely to change dramatically with reauthorization. In other areas, there have been occasions to modify the existing MPO structure, procedures and/or policies to bring about a more balanced partnership between federal, state and local players. This paper outlines these partnerships.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 greatly enhanced the cooperative efforts of federal, state, and local officials in the metropolitan transportation planning process. By granting increased responsibility to the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), ISTEA expanded the partnership approach to directing the investment of federal highway and transit dollars in many regions of the nation. The bill's enactment reinforced the long-standing 3C's of cooperation, collaboration, and consensus building by providing broader participation in transportation decision-making. Since the passage of ISTEA, MPO partnerships have been tested and scrutinized against the backdrop of the metropolitan transportation planning and investment process. In some cases, the institutional arrangements of particular MPOs have not allowed for the increased participation called for in ISTEA. In a number of areas, the dissatisfaction of partners and stakeholders reflects a consequence of limited funding - a scenario that is not likely to change dramatically with reauthorization. In other areas, there have been occasions to modify the existing MPO structure, procedures and/or policies to bring about a more balanced partnership between federal, state and local players. This paper outlines these partnerships.
Key concepts: Metropolitan area, General partnership, Business, Investment (military), Transportation planning, Public administration, Legislation, Finance