1993Unpublished venueRequires access

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR LEFT-TURN PHASING, INDICATION SEQUENCE, AND AUXILIARY SIGN. FINAL REPORT

Seth Adu Asante, Siamak Ardekani, James C. Williams

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The report documents the development of guidelines and recommendations for the selection of the left-turn phasing, indication sequences and auxiliary signs. The guidelines developed are based on field studies of over 100 intersections in nine Texas counties and utilize easy to obtain data for the selection process. A three-level decision process regarding the suitability of left-turn phasing treatment to be used is established. The process favors the least restrictive permissive left-turn phase unless traffic and geometric conditions warrant the more restrictive protected/permissive or protected only phasings. The guidelines developed are based on threshold values designed to determine what constitutes an excessive value for any particular decision variable beyond which more restrictive left-turn phasing treatments may be justified. Recommendations concerning signal indications and auxilliary signs are made based on delay, safety and degree of motorists' understanding. The study results show that selection of any particular phasing is a multi-objective process involving a number of factors, and in many cases more than one condition must be met to justify the selection of a particular phase to ensure an optimum solution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The report documents the development of guidelines and recommendations for the selection of the left-turn phasing, indication sequences and auxiliary signs. The guidelines developed are based on field studies of over 100 intersections in nine Texas counties and utilize easy to obtain data for the selection process. A three-level decision process regarding the suitability of left-turn phasing treatment to be used is established. The process favors the least restrictive permissive left-turn phase unless traffic and geometric conditions warrant the more restrictive protected/permissive or protected only phasings. The guidelines developed are based on threshold values designed to determine what constitutes an excessive value for any particular decision variable beyond which more restrictive left-turn phasing treatments may be justified. Recommendations concerning signal indications and auxilliary signs are made based on delay, safety and degree of motorists' understanding. The study results show that selection of any particular phasing is a multi-objective process involving a number of factors, and in many cases more than one condition must be met to justify the selection of a particular phase to ensure an optimum solution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The report documents the development of guidelines and recommendations for the selection of the left-turn phasing, indication sequences and auxiliary signs. The guidelines developed are based on field studies of over 100 intersections in nine Texas counties and utilize easy to obtain data for the selection process. A three-level decision process regarding the suitability of left-turn phasing treatment to be used is established. The process favors the least restrictive permissive left-turn phase unless traffic and geometric conditions warrant the more restrictive protected/permissive or protected only phasings. The guidelines developed are based on threshold values designed to determine what constitutes an excessive value for any particular decision variable beyond which more restrictive left-turn phasing treatments may be justified. Recommendations concerning signal indications and auxilliary signs are made based on delay, safety and degree of motorists' understanding. The study results show that selection of any particular phasing is a multi-objective process involving a number of factors, and in many cases more than one condition must be met to justify the selection of a particular phase to ensure an optimum solution.

Key concepts: Phaser, Warrant, Selection (genetic algorithm), Sign (mathematics), Process (computing), Sequence (biology), Computer science, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SELECTION CRITERIA FOR LEFT-TURN PHASING, INDICATION SEQUENCE, AND AUXILIARY SIGN. FINAL REPORT — Research Paper | ScholarLens