2002Unpublished venueRequires access

WHY WITNESSES TO ACCIDENTS MAKE MISTAKES: THE COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY OF HUMAN MEMORY. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN TRAFFIC SAFETY

Ralph Norman Haber, Lawrence Haber

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Scientific research has shown that human memory is far from literally accurate, even though people often describe from memory events they have observed and usually consider their descriptions to be accurate. Described here will first be the factors that affect how accurately events are observed and recorded into memory, and then the factors that affect how accurately events are recalled. Followed will be discussion on: retention of memory for experienced events; forgetting of memory; improvement in recall and recovery of memory; the way memory for everyday and unusual events differs in accuracy; individual differences: do some people have better memories than others?; the surprising lack of a relationship between confidence and accuracy; the surprising lack of a relationship between confidence and accuracy; and, when are two witnesses better that one?.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Scientific research has shown that human memory is far from literally accurate, even though people often describe from memory events they have observed and usually consider their descriptions to be accurate. Described here will first be the factors that affect how accurately events are observed and recorded into memory, and then the factors that affect how accurately events are recalled. Followed will be discussion on: retention of memory for experienced events; forgetting of memory; improvement in recall and recovery of memory; the way memory for everyday and unusual events differs in accuracy; individual differences: do some people have better memories than others?; the surprising lack of a relationship between confidence and accuracy; the surprising lack of a relationship between confidence and accuracy; and, when are two witnesses better that one?.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Scientific research has shown that human memory is far from literally accurate, even though people often describe from memory events they have observed and usually consider their descriptions to be accurate. Described here will first be the factors that affect how accurately events are observed and recorded into memory, and then the factors that affect how accurately events are recalled. Followed will be discussion on: retention of memory for experienced events; forgetting of memory; improvement in recall and recovery of memory; the way memory for everyday and unusual events differs in accuracy; individual differences: do some people have better memories than others?; the surprising lack of a relationship between confidence and accuracy; the surprising lack of a relationship between confidence and accuracy; and, when are two witnesses better that one?.

Key concepts: Forgetting, Human memory, Recall, Memory errors, Affect (linguistics), Psychology, Cognitive psychology, Eyewitness memory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
WHY WITNESSES TO ACCIDENTS MAKE MISTAKES: THE COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY OF HUMAN MEMORY. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN TRAFFIC SAFETY — Research Paper | ScholarLens