2014International Journal of Vehicle DesignRequires access

Three–axle buses: a solution for reducing axle load

Atilla P. Kiraly

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The need to reduce axle load has led to the increasing use of the third axle on buses and coaches. Disadvantages include extra cost, higher operating and maintenance costs, and increased noise. Various methods of installing the third axle are discussed. Technical problems involved in installing the third axle include: finding an optimum steering angle, wheelbase, rear and front overhang and wheelbase for the double axle; finding the optimal axle–load distribution; calculating the modified load distribution for the frame, the extra load on the frame when the trailer axle is unloaded; and controlling the air pressure in the air springs. Simplified two–axle and three–axle models in the form of a lattice–type frame were used to simulate the bending moment distribution. Results show that, by using the third axle, maximum bending decreases on the sidewalls and longitudinal members of the frame.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The need to reduce axle load has led to the increasing use of the third axle on buses and coaches. Disadvantages include extra cost, higher operating and maintenance costs, and increased noise. Various methods of installing the third axle are discussed. Technical problems involved in installing the third axle include: finding an optimum steering angle, wheelbase, rear and front overhang and wheelbase for the double axle; finding the optimal axle–load distribution; calculating the modified load distribution for the frame, the extra load on the frame when the trailer axle is unloaded; and controlling the air pressure in the air springs. Simplified two–axle and three–axle models in the form of a lattice–type frame were used to simulate the bending moment distribution. Results show that, by using the third axle, maximum bending decreases on the sidewalls and longitudinal members of the frame.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The need to reduce axle load has led to the increasing use of the third axle on buses and coaches. Disadvantages include extra cost, higher operating and maintenance costs, and increased noise. Various methods of installing the third axle are discussed. Technical problems involved in installing the third axle include: finding an optimum steering angle, wheelbase, rear and front overhang and wheelbase for the double axle; finding the optimal axle–load distribution; calculating the modified load distribution for the frame, the extra load on the frame when the trailer axle is unloaded; and controlling the air pressure in the air springs. Simplified two–axle and three–axle models in the form of a lattice–type frame were used to simulate the bending moment distribution. Results show that, by using the third axle, maximum bending decreases on the sidewalls and longitudinal members of the frame.

Key concepts: Axle, Axle load, Engineering, Automotive engineering, Trailer, Structural engineering, Truck

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Three–axle buses: a solution for reducing axle load — Research Paper | ScholarLens