Noise evaluation of four exhaust nozzles for afterburning turbojet engine
J. R. Balombin, G. V. Darchuk
Abstract
Open-access reader
J. R. Balombin, G. V. Darchuk
Abstract
Open-access reader
Sea level static tests were made of three different nozzle designs suitable for applica- T y p e o f Report and Period Covered Technical Memorandum Sponsoring Agency Codetion to a supersonic cruise aircraft.At military power, results obtained with a plug nozzle, a variable flap ejector, and an auxiliary inlet ejector were compared with that of a convergent primary nozzle.At maximum afterburning only the primary and two ejector nozzles were tested.Based on the noise measurements made, it was calculated that for a flyover at 1000 f t (304.8 m) altitude, the maximum perceived noise level on the ground would be 6 dB less with the plug nozzle than with the auxiliary inlet ejector.17.K a y Words ( S u g g e s t e d by Author(s)) J e t noise Variable flap ejector Exhaust nozzle Perceived noise Afterburning turbojet takeoff evaluation Plug nozzle Auxiliary inlet Supersonic cruise ejector 18.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Sea level static tests were made of three different nozzle designs suitable for applica- T y p e o f Report and Period Covered Technical Memorandum Sponsoring Agency Codetion to a supersonic cruise aircraft.At military power, results obtained with a plug nozzle, a variable flap ejector, and an auxiliary inlet ejector were compared with that of a convergent primary nozzle.At maximum afterburning only the primary and two ejector nozzles were tested.Based on the noise measurements made, it was calculated that for a flyover at 1000 f t (304.8 m) altitude, the maximum perceived noise level on the ground would be 6 dB less with the plug nozzle than with the auxiliary inlet ejector.17.K a y Words ( S u g g e s t e d by Author(s)) J e t noise Variable flap ejector Exhaust nozzle Perceived noise Afterburning turbojet takeoff evaluation Plug nozzle Auxiliary inlet Supersonic cruise ejector 18.
Key concepts: Turbojet, Noise (video), Acoustics, Nozzle, Computer science, Aeronautics, Engineering, Aerospace engineering