1970NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA)Open access

Noise evaluation of four exhaust nozzles for afterburning turbojet engine

J. R. Balombin, G. V. Darchuk

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Sea level static tests were made of three different nozzle designs suitable for applica- T y p e o f Report and Period Covered Technical Memorandum Sponsoring Agency Codetion to a supersonic cruise aircraft.At military power, results obtained with a plug nozzle, a variable flap ejector, and an auxiliary inlet ejector were compared with that of a convergent primary nozzle.At maximum afterburning only the primary and two ejector nozzles were tested.Based on the noise measurements made, it was calculated that for a flyover at 1000 f t (304.8 m) altitude, the maximum perceived noise level on the ground would be 6 dB less with the plug nozzle than with the auxiliary inlet ejector.17.K a y Words ( S u g g e s t e d by Author(s)) J e t noise Variable flap ejector Exhaust nozzle Perceived noise Afterburning turbojet takeoff evaluation Plug nozzle Auxiliary inlet Supersonic cruise ejector 18.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sea level static tests were made of three different nozzle designs suitable for applica- T y p e o f Report and Period Covered Technical Memorandum Sponsoring Agency Codetion to a supersonic cruise aircraft.At military power, results obtained with a plug nozzle, a variable flap ejector, and an auxiliary inlet ejector were compared with that of a convergent primary nozzle.At maximum afterburning only the primary and two ejector nozzles were tested.Based on the noise measurements made, it was calculated that for a flyover at 1000 f t (304.8 m) altitude, the maximum perceived noise level on the ground would be 6 dB less with the plug nozzle than with the auxiliary inlet ejector.17.K a y Words ( S u g g e s t e d by Author(s)) J e t noise Variable flap ejector Exhaust nozzle Perceived noise Afterburning turbojet takeoff evaluation Plug nozzle Auxiliary inlet Supersonic cruise ejector 18.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sea level static tests were made of three different nozzle designs suitable for applica- T y p e o f Report and Period Covered Technical Memorandum Sponsoring Agency Codetion to a supersonic cruise aircraft.At military power, results obtained with a plug nozzle, a variable flap ejector, and an auxiliary inlet ejector were compared with that of a convergent primary nozzle.At maximum afterburning only the primary and two ejector nozzles were tested.Based on the noise measurements made, it was calculated that for a flyover at 1000 f t (304.8 m) altitude, the maximum perceived noise level on the ground would be 6 dB less with the plug nozzle than with the auxiliary inlet ejector.17.K a y Words ( S u g g e s t e d by Author(s)) J e t noise Variable flap ejector Exhaust nozzle Perceived noise Afterburning turbojet takeoff evaluation Plug nozzle Auxiliary inlet Supersonic cruise ejector 18.

Key concepts: Turbojet, Noise (video), Acoustics, Nozzle, Computer science, Aeronautics, Engineering, Aerospace engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Noise evaluation of four exhaust nozzles for afterburning turbojet engine — Research Paper | ScholarLens