ScholarLens Back to search
2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

Sovereign Equality and Moral Disagreement: Premises of a Pluralist International Legal Order

Brad R. Roth

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

Overview of the Argument PART ONE: A NORMATIVE THEORY OF A PLURALIST INTERNATIONAL ORDER The Project of International Legal Order The Moral Significance of State Sovereignty Coming to Terms with Ruthlessness: Bounded Pluralism and Human Rights Violators PART TWO: SOVEREIGN EQUALITY IN CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL LAW Principals and Agents: States, Governments, and the Self-Determination of Peoples Sovereignty, Consent, and the Interpretation of International Legal Obligations Sovereignty and the Relationship between International and Domestic Legal Authority Sovereignty, Human Rights, and the Non-Intervention Norm Conclusion: The Enduring Relevance of Sovereign Equality

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Overview of the Argument PART ONE: A NORMATIVE THEORY OF A PLURALIST INTERNATIONAL ORDER The Project of International Legal Order The Moral Significance of State Sovereignty Coming to Terms with Ruthlessness: Bounded Pluralism and Human Rights Violators PART TWO: SOVEREIGN EQUALITY IN CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL LAW Principals and Agents: States, Governments, and the Self-Determination of Peoples Sovereignty, Consent, and the Interpretation of International Legal Obligations Sovereignty and the Relationship between International and Domestic Legal Authority Sovereignty, Human Rights, and the Non-Intervention Norm Conclusion: The Enduring Relevance of Sovereign Equality

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Overview of the Argument PART ONE: A NORMATIVE THEORY OF A PLURALIST INTERNATIONAL ORDER The Project of International Legal Order The Moral Significance of State Sovereignty Coming to Terms with Ruthlessness: Bounded Pluralism and Human Rights Violators PART TWO: SOVEREIGN EQUALITY IN CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL LAW Principals and Agents: States, Governments, and the Self-Determination of Peoples Sovereignty, Consent, and the Interpretation of International Legal Obligations Sovereignty and the Relationship between International and Domestic Legal Authority Sovereignty, Human Rights, and the Non-Intervention Norm Conclusion: The Enduring Relevance of Sovereign Equality

Key concepts: Sovereignty, Political science, Legal pluralism, Law, International law, Human rights, Normative, Norm (philosophy)

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sovereign Equality and Moral Disagreement: Premises of a Pluralist International Legal Order — Research Paper | ScholarLens