2014Journal of the Association for Information SystemsRequires access

A STUDY OF DATA QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR EMPIRICAL DATA IN THE FOOD SCIENCES

Karl Presser, David P. Weber, Moira C. Norrie

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Data quality is a critical issu in scientific databases since the reliability of empirical data can have a major impact on the formation of scientific theories and policy decisions. Yet while several conceptual frameworks for data quality have been proposed, there is still a lack of general tools and metrics to measure and control the quality of empirical data in practice. As a first step in this direction, we carried out a detailed study of data quality requirements in a system designed to support food scientists by managing data about food composition. Our users included system designers and developers as well as food compilers and project managers. In addition to determining which dimensions of data quality specified in existing conceptual frameworks users consider important in assessing the reliability of data, we also asked users to assess the importance of various criteria related specifically to empirical data. These factors were based around the four steps typical in the life-cycle of empirical data, namely sampling, analysis, data acquisition and data processing. Another novel feature of our study was to investigate not only the different dimensions of data quality considered to be important but also how this depends on the role of users.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Data quality is a critical issu in scientific databases since the reliability of empirical data can have a major impact on the formation of scientific theories and policy decisions. Yet while several conceptual frameworks for data quality have been proposed, there is still a lack of general tools and metrics to measure and control the quality of empirical data in practice. As a first step in this direction, we carried out a detailed study of data quality requirements in a system designed to support food scientists by managing data about food composition. Our users included system designers and developers as well as food compilers and project managers. In addition to determining which dimensions of data quality specified in existing conceptual frameworks users consider important in assessing the reliability of data, we also asked users to assess the importance of various criteria related specifically to empirical data. These factors were based around the four steps typical in the life-cycle of empirical data, namely sampling, analysis, data acquisition and data processing. Another novel feature of our study was to investigate not only the different dimensions of data quality considered to be important but also how this depends on the role of users.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Data quality is a critical issu in scientific databases since the reliability of empirical data can have a major impact on the formation of scientific theories and policy decisions. Yet while several conceptual frameworks for data quality have been proposed, there is still a lack of general tools and metrics to measure and control the quality of empirical data in practice. As a first step in this direction, we carried out a detailed study of data quality requirements in a system designed to support food scientists by managing data about food composition. Our users included system designers and developers as well as food compilers and project managers. In addition to determining which dimensions of data quality specified in existing conceptual frameworks users consider important in assessing the reliability of data, we also asked users to assess the importance of various criteria related specifically to empirical data. These factors were based around the four steps typical in the life-cycle of empirical data, namely sampling, analysis, data acquisition and data processing. Another novel feature of our study was to investigate not only the different dimensions of data quality considered to be important but also how this depends on the role of users.

Key concepts: Computer science, Data quality, Data science, Quality (philosophy), Reliability (semiconductor), Empirical research, Data modeling, Data mining

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A STUDY OF DATA QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR EMPIRICAL DATA IN THE FOOD SCIENCES — Research Paper | ScholarLens