1993Unpublished venueRequires access

CURVE WARNING SIGN STUDY. FINAL REPORT

J Bhullar, R Moore, C D Cutler

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This report determines how curve warning sign guidelines are being interpreted and implemented by districts in California. Generally, district traffic engineers consider the existing criteria for curve warning signs and advisory speed plates in Chapter 4 of the Traffic Manual (California Department of Transportation, 1982) to be adequate direction for their use. The policies provide enough general direction to allow engineers to design specific sign installations that will be uniformly understood by the public. The largest difference in sign application occurred with the W14 sign and its repetition within a winding highway section. This report suggests that this sign is not as effective as believed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report determines how curve warning sign guidelines are being interpreted and implemented by districts in California. Generally, district traffic engineers consider the existing criteria for curve warning signs and advisory speed plates in Chapter 4 of the Traffic Manual (California Department of Transportation, 1982) to be adequate direction for their use. The policies provide enough general direction to allow engineers to design specific sign installations that will be uniformly understood by the public. The largest difference in sign application occurred with the W14 sign and its repetition within a winding highway section. This report suggests that this sign is not as effective as believed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report determines how curve warning sign guidelines are being interpreted and implemented by districts in California. Generally, district traffic engineers consider the existing criteria for curve warning signs and advisory speed plates in Chapter 4 of the Traffic Manual (California Department of Transportation, 1982) to be adequate direction for their use. The policies provide enough general direction to allow engineers to design specific sign installations that will be uniformly understood by the public. The largest difference in sign application occurred with the W14 sign and its repetition within a winding highway section. This report suggests that this sign is not as effective as believed.

Key concepts: Sign (mathematics), Warning system, Warning signs, Traffic sign, Section (typography), Repetition (rhetorical device), Computer science, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CURVE WARNING SIGN STUDY. FINAL REPORT — Research Paper | ScholarLens