1995OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Requires access

Charging for Roads: A Better Way to Ease Congestion

Michael Schabas

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to road use charging, which is alternative to the approach being explored by the Department of Transport (DOT). Several questions are raised about the DOT approach. The author's approach requires much less physical equipment, and does not require vehicle owners or drivers to fit any equipment to their vehicles. The UK's existing Vehicle Excise Duty, currently a flat #135 annual rate for private vehicles, would be replaced with banded charges reflecting actual road use, and perhaps varying from #50 to #1000 per year. All users would continue to have occasional access to all parts of the road network. The system would be enforced by electronic matching of licence plates against a register of paid-up users. This policy should be able to achieve the desired objective of discouraging unnecessary road use, while raising revenue for the Government. It should first be tested in city centre trials. In contrast to the DOT proposals, it can easily be implemented with existing technology. Experience in North America suggests that motorists support higher road taxes if the funds are spent, not on more roads, but on improved public transport as an alternative. The author suggests assigning a proportion to public transport, at least as a transitional measure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents an approach to road use charging, which is alternative to the approach being explored by the Department of Transport (DOT). Several questions are raised about the DOT approach. The author's approach requires much less physical equipment, and does not require vehicle owners or drivers to fit any equipment to their vehicles. The UK's existing Vehicle Excise Duty, currently a flat #135 annual rate for private vehicles, would be replaced with banded charges reflecting actual road use, and perhaps varying from #50 to #1000 per year. All users would continue to have occasional access to all parts of the road network. The system would be enforced by electronic matching of licence plates against a register of paid-up users. This policy should be able to achieve the desired objective of discouraging unnecessary road use, while raising revenue for the Government. It should first be tested in city centre trials. In contrast to the DOT proposals, it can easily be implemented with existing technology. Experience in North America suggests that motorists support higher road taxes if the funds are spent, not on more roads, but on improved public transport as an alternative. The author suggests assigning a proportion to public transport, at least as a transitional measure.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents an approach to road use charging, which is alternative to the approach being explored by the Department of Transport (DOT). Several questions are raised about the DOT approach. The author's approach requires much less physical equipment, and does not require vehicle owners or drivers to fit any equipment to their vehicles. The UK's existing Vehicle Excise Duty, currently a flat #135 annual rate for private vehicles, would be replaced with banded charges reflecting actual road use, and perhaps varying from #50 to #1000 per year. All users would continue to have occasional access to all parts of the road network. The system would be enforced by electronic matching of licence plates against a register of paid-up users. This policy should be able to achieve the desired objective of discouraging unnecessary road use, while raising revenue for the Government. It should first be tested in city centre trials. In contrast to the DOT proposals, it can easily be implemented with existing technology. Experience in North America suggests that motorists support higher road taxes if the funds are spent, not on more roads, but on improved public transport as an alternative. The author suggests assigning a proportion to public transport, at least as a transitional measure.

Key concepts: Revenue, Transport engineering, Excise, Public transport, Government (linguistics), Private transport, Traffic congestion, Matching (statistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Charging for Roads: A Better Way to Ease Congestion — Research Paper | ScholarLens