2014NECTAR - Northampton Electronic Collection of Thesis and Research (University of Northampton)Open access

Bringing history to life: pedagogical approaches to dance history in higher education

Kelly Louise Preece

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In ‘The Sense of the Past’ (1999) Shelley Berg argues that ‘[a]lthough the performance and analysis of masterpieces of dance repertory are central to the tradition of dance history, we have not fully explored the educational potential of the process of reconstruction and revival.’ (243) Fourteen years later, dance history is still primarily a lecture/seminar rather than studio-based branch of the discipline. This scholarly paper will introduce my use of reconstruction as a pedagogical approach to teaching dance history. I will argue that as choreography is primarily taught through embodied practice in the studio, an effective way to facilitate students to make connections between their choreographic practice and its historical heritage would be through the introduction of reconstruction work into the teaching of dance history. Using reflections on my own teaching practice, I will propose that reconstruction work here can bridge the gap between students’ experience of history in the lecture/seminar with their experience of choreography in the studio. My paper therefore combines the following conference themes: \ndeveloping choreographers and dancers in diverse settings and genres \napproaches to dance education and training \nissues around heritage, adaptation and re-versioning of dance works \n \nReference \nBerg, S. (1999). The Sense of the Past. In S.H. Fraleigh and P. Hanstein (Eds.), Researching Dance: Evolving Modes of Enquiry (pp. 225-248). London: Dance Books.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In ‘The Sense of the Past’ (1999) Shelley Berg argues that ‘[a]lthough the performance and analysis of masterpieces of dance repertory are central to the tradition of dance history, we have not fully explored the educational potential of the process of reconstruction and revival.’ (243) Fourteen years later, dance history is still primarily a lecture/seminar rather than studio-based branch of the discipline. This scholarly paper will introduce my use of reconstruction as a pedagogical approach to teaching dance history. I will argue that as choreography is primarily taught through embodied practice in the studio, an effective way to facilitate students to make connections between their choreographic practice and its historical heritage would be through the introduction of reconstruction work into the teaching of dance history. Using reflections on my own teaching practice, I will propose that reconstruction work here can bridge the gap between students’ experience of history in the lecture/seminar with their experience of choreography in the studio. My paper therefore combines the following conference themes: \ndeveloping choreographers and dancers in diverse settings and genres \napproaches to dance education and training \nissues around heritage, adaptation and re-versioning of dance works \n \nReference \nBerg, S. (1999). The Sense of the Past. In S.H. Fraleigh and P. Hanstein (Eds.), Researching Dance: Evolving Modes of Enquiry (pp. 225-248). London: Dance Books.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In ‘The Sense of the Past’ (1999) Shelley Berg argues that ‘[a]lthough the performance and analysis of masterpieces of dance repertory are central to the tradition of dance history, we have not fully explored the educational potential of the process of reconstruction and revival.’ (243) Fourteen years later, dance history is still primarily a lecture/seminar rather than studio-based branch of the discipline. This scholarly paper will introduce my use of reconstruction as a pedagogical approach to teaching dance history. I will argue that as choreography is primarily taught through embodied practice in the studio, an effective way to facilitate students to make connections between their choreographic practice and its historical heritage would be through the introduction of reconstruction work into the teaching of dance history. Using reflections on my own teaching practice, I will propose that reconstruction work here can bridge the gap between students’ experience of history in the lecture/seminar with their experience of choreography in the studio. My paper therefore combines the following conference themes: \ndeveloping choreographers and dancers in diverse settings and genres \napproaches to dance education and training \nissues around heritage, adaptation and re-versioning of dance works \n \nReference \nBerg, S. (1999). The Sense of the Past. In S.H. Fraleigh and P. Hanstein (Eds.), Researching Dance: Evolving Modes of Enquiry (pp. 225-248). London: Dance Books.

Key concepts: Dance, Choreography, Studio, Contemporary dance, Visual arts, Dance education, Dance improvisation, Modern dance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source