1990•Publication of: RoutledgeRequires access

LOCAL AGENCY EXPERIENCE WITH THE UTILIZATION OF BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN FINLAND AND THE UNITED STATES. BRIDGE MANAGEMENT. INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE, ASSESSMENT AND REPAIR. PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BRIDGE MANAGEMENT, UNIVERSITY OF SURREY, GUILDFORD, MARCH 28-30, 1990

Allen Marshall, M K Soederqvist

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In recent years significant efforts have been made to collect, review, manage and analyse information on bridge structures in many countries. In many cases these data are organized into computerized bridge management systems (BMS) which usually include additional analytic and programmatic capabilities beyond mere record-keeping for structures. These systems often are intended to define and establish national bridge infrastructure priorities. In many cases local government agencies have been the primary collection agents for the various data maintained in bridge management systems which include inventory, structural conditions and appraisal information. The national uses for bridge management systems tend to focus on network level programming and forecasting of resource utilization and have been widely discussed in a variety of different forums and professional publications. This paper discusses the actual uses that bridge management professionals working at the regional or local level have for BMS data bases. The paper is based on interviews conducted with bridge management staff in a local highway agency and an urban transit authority in the US and with district bridge engineers in Finland. The case study discussion is intended to provide BMS system users and designers with a better understanding of the positive and negative consequences of the elaboration of national bridge management systems at the grassroots level.(A) For the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD 830553.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In recent years significant efforts have been made to collect, review, manage and analyse information on bridge structures in many countries. In many cases these data are organized into computerized bridge management systems (BMS) which usually include additional analytic and programmatic capabilities beyond mere record-keeping for structures. These systems often are intended to define and establish national bridge infrastructure priorities. In many cases local government agencies have been the primary collection agents for the various data maintained in bridge management systems which include inventory, structural conditions and appraisal information. The national uses for bridge management systems tend to focus on network level programming and forecasting of resource utilization and have been widely discussed in a variety of different forums and professional publications. This paper discusses the actual uses that bridge management professionals working at the regional or local level have for BMS data bases. The paper is based on interviews conducted with bridge management staff in a local highway agency and an urban transit authority in the US and with district bridge engineers in Finland. The case study discussion is intended to provide BMS system users and designers with a better understanding of the positive and negative consequences of the elaboration of national bridge management systems at the grassroots level.(A) For the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD 830553.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In recent years significant efforts have been made to collect, review, manage and analyse information on bridge structures in many countries. In many cases these data are organized into computerized bridge management systems (BMS) which usually include additional analytic and programmatic capabilities beyond mere record-keeping for structures. These systems often are intended to define and establish national bridge infrastructure priorities. In many cases local government agencies have been the primary collection agents for the various data maintained in bridge management systems which include inventory, structural conditions and appraisal information. The national uses for bridge management systems tend to focus on network level programming and forecasting of resource utilization and have been widely discussed in a variety of different forums and professional publications. This paper discusses the actual uses that bridge management professionals working at the regional or local level have for BMS data bases. The paper is based on interviews conducted with bridge management staff in a local highway agency and an urban transit authority in the US and with district bridge engineers in Finland. The case study discussion is intended to provide BMS system users and designers with a better understanding of the positive and negative consequences of the elaboration of national bridge management systems at the grassroots level.(A) For the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD 830553.

Key concepts: Bridge (graph theory), Agency (philosophy), Grassroots, Variety (cybernetics), Management system, Engineering, Government (linguistics), Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LOCAL AGENCY EXPERIENCE WITH THE UTILIZATION OF BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN FINLAND AND THE UNITED STATES. BRIDGE MANAGEMENT. INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE, ASSESSMENT AND REPAIR. PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BRIDGE MANAGEMENT, UNIVERSITY OF SURREY, GUILDFORD, MARCH 28-30, 1990 — Research Paper | ScholarLens