2005International Journal of Vehicle SafetyRequires access

Benefits of a 3+2-point belt system and an inboard torso side support in frontal, far-side and rollover crashes

Ola Boström, Yngve Håland

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Occupants using a 3-point belt are still being injured in numerous crashes. In side collisions, occupants on the opposite side of the vehicle to the intrusion are mainly restrained by the lap part of the 3-point belt, with the associated high risk of sustaining a severe head injury. During a rollover crash, the 3-point belt cannot fully prevent harmful head impacts. In this study, an additional 2-point torso belt is combined with an inboard torso side support. The idea is to distribute the belt load on more anatomical structures (bones) and restrain the occupant in the inboard and upward directions. The inboard side support prevents direct loading by the 2-point belt to the cervical spine in far-side collisions. To assess whether this design measure is of benefit, frontal, far-side and rollover tests were performed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Occupants using a 3-point belt are still being injured in numerous crashes. In side collisions, occupants on the opposite side of the vehicle to the intrusion are mainly restrained by the lap part of the 3-point belt, with the associated high risk of sustaining a severe head injury. During a rollover crash, the 3-point belt cannot fully prevent harmful head impacts. In this study, an additional 2-point torso belt is combined with an inboard torso side support. The idea is to distribute the belt load on more anatomical structures (bones) and restrain the occupant in the inboard and upward directions. The inboard side support prevents direct loading by the 2-point belt to the cervical spine in far-side collisions. To assess whether this design measure is of benefit, frontal, far-side and rollover tests were performed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Occupants using a 3-point belt are still being injured in numerous crashes. In side collisions, occupants on the opposite side of the vehicle to the intrusion are mainly restrained by the lap part of the 3-point belt, with the associated high risk of sustaining a severe head injury. During a rollover crash, the 3-point belt cannot fully prevent harmful head impacts. In this study, an additional 2-point torso belt is combined with an inboard torso side support. The idea is to distribute the belt load on more anatomical structures (bones) and restrain the occupant in the inboard and upward directions. The inboard side support prevents direct loading by the 2-point belt to the cervical spine in far-side collisions. To assess whether this design measure is of benefit, frontal, far-side and rollover tests were performed.

Key concepts: Torso, Far side of the Moon, Crash, Rollover (web design), Side impact, Head (geology), Hybrid III, Poison control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Benefits of a 3+2-point belt system and an inboard torso side support in frontal, far-side and rollover crashes — Research Paper | ScholarLens