1995•Unpublished venueRequires access

PUBLIC TRANSPORT AND THE LOCATION OF NEW DEVELOPMENT

D Wignall

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper discusses some implications of the UK Government's new change of direction in land use and transport policy indicated by its publication of PPG13 in March 1994. The trend of urban decentralisation and extensive out-of-town development in the UK seems to be in process of being substantially limited. The central issues seem to be: (1) whether and how to accommodate all types of development within the new land use and transport planning system; and (2) whether public transport should be expected to play an increasing part in influencing development location and reducing actual or potential future car usage. The paper concentrates on policies for B1 Business Parks, because this form of development currently generates high private car demand, and is typically located away from urban centres. The policy context is considered first; it appears that the types of arguments used in PPG13 are likely to influence future Government policy increasingly. Current practice in access planning does not fit in easily with the changing nature of Government policy advice; the current requirements for B1 Business Park planning are becoming especially difficult to meet. Public transport is unlikely to be used much in trips to and from business parks, as long as unrestricted car parking or unrestrained car access are allowed. For the covering abstract see IRRD 879912.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper discusses some implications of the UK Government's new change of direction in land use and transport policy indicated by its publication of PPG13 in March 1994. The trend of urban decentralisation and extensive out-of-town development in the UK seems to be in process of being substantially limited. The central issues seem to be: (1) whether and how to accommodate all types of development within the new land use and transport planning system; and (2) whether public transport should be expected to play an increasing part in influencing development location and reducing actual or potential future car usage. The paper concentrates on policies for B1 Business Parks, because this form of development currently generates high private car demand, and is typically located away from urban centres. The policy context is considered first; it appears that the types of arguments used in PPG13 are likely to influence future Government policy increasingly. Current practice in access planning does not fit in easily with the changing nature of Government policy advice; the current requirements for B1 Business Park planning are becoming especially difficult to meet. Public transport is unlikely to be used much in trips to and from business parks, as long as unrestricted car parking or unrestrained car access are allowed. For the covering abstract see IRRD 879912.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper discusses some implications of the UK Government's new change of direction in land use and transport policy indicated by its publication of PPG13 in March 1994. The trend of urban decentralisation and extensive out-of-town development in the UK seems to be in process of being substantially limited. The central issues seem to be: (1) whether and how to accommodate all types of development within the new land use and transport planning system; and (2) whether public transport should be expected to play an increasing part in influencing development location and reducing actual or potential future car usage. The paper concentrates on policies for B1 Business Parks, because this form of development currently generates high private car demand, and is typically located away from urban centres. The policy context is considered first; it appears that the types of arguments used in PPG13 are likely to influence future Government policy increasingly. Current practice in access planning does not fit in easily with the changing nature of Government policy advice; the current requirements for B1 Business Park planning are becoming especially difficult to meet. Public transport is unlikely to be used much in trips to and from business parks, as long as unrestricted car parking or unrestrained car access are allowed. For the covering abstract see IRRD 879912.

Key concepts: TRIPS architecture, Decentralization, Public transport, Government (linguistics), Business, Context (archaeology), Public policy, Transportation planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PUBLIC TRANSPORT AND THE LOCATION OF NEW DEVELOPMENT — Research Paper | ScholarLens