1977Unpublished venueRequires access

LOW FARE AND FARE-FREE TRANSIT; SOME RECENT APPLICATIONS BY U.S. TRANSIT SYSTEMS

K M Goodman, M A Green

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to provide a reference document describing succinct case studies of the experience accrued by more than 40 U.S. transit systems which have introduced fare-free of reduced-fare services of one form or another in recent years. The report is a useful reference document for decision makers contemplating similar pricing policies as well as a preliminary planning guide to the UMTA for the development of demonstration programs to evaluate various transit pricing and service strategies. Many different types of fare reductions were identified. They are classified into five broad divisions: (a) systemwide fare reductions without any restrictions; (b) fare reductions applicable to specific geographical areas only--typically the CBD; (c) fare reductions which are operable only during limited hours--typically the off-peak hours; (d) fare reductions subject to both geographical and time-of-day restrictions; and (e) fare reductions of short duration implemented chiefly for promotional purposes. When viewed from the limited perspective of financial aspects of transit system operations it does not appear that fare reductions alone have had a favorable impact on the overall economic conditions of transit systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this report is to provide a reference document describing succinct case studies of the experience accrued by more than 40 U.S. transit systems which have introduced fare-free of reduced-fare services of one form or another in recent years. The report is a useful reference document for decision makers contemplating similar pricing policies as well as a preliminary planning guide to the UMTA for the development of demonstration programs to evaluate various transit pricing and service strategies. Many different types of fare reductions were identified. They are classified into five broad divisions: (a) systemwide fare reductions without any restrictions; (b) fare reductions applicable to specific geographical areas only--typically the CBD; (c) fare reductions which are operable only during limited hours--typically the off-peak hours; (d) fare reductions subject to both geographical and time-of-day restrictions; and (e) fare reductions of short duration implemented chiefly for promotional purposes. When viewed from the limited perspective of financial aspects of transit system operations it does not appear that fare reductions alone have had a favorable impact on the overall economic conditions of transit systems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this report is to provide a reference document describing succinct case studies of the experience accrued by more than 40 U.S. transit systems which have introduced fare-free of reduced-fare services of one form or another in recent years. The report is a useful reference document for decision makers contemplating similar pricing policies as well as a preliminary planning guide to the UMTA for the development of demonstration programs to evaluate various transit pricing and service strategies. Many different types of fare reductions were identified. They are classified into five broad divisions: (a) systemwide fare reductions without any restrictions; (b) fare reductions applicable to specific geographical areas only--typically the CBD; (c) fare reductions which are operable only during limited hours--typically the off-peak hours; (d) fare reductions subject to both geographical and time-of-day restrictions; and (e) fare reductions of short duration implemented chiefly for promotional purposes. When viewed from the limited perspective of financial aspects of transit system operations it does not appear that fare reductions alone have had a favorable impact on the overall economic conditions of transit systems.

Key concepts: Transit (satellite), Public transport, Duration (music), Transit system, Service (business), Business, Transport engineering, Operations research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LOW FARE AND FARE-FREE TRANSIT; SOME RECENT APPLICATIONS BY U.S. TRANSIT SYSTEMS — Research Paper | ScholarLens