30 years of travel in Melbourne: 1978/79 and 2007/08
Craig Mcgeoch
Abstract
Craig Mcgeoch
Abstract
This paper compares travel behaviour for Melbourne reported in the 1978/79 Melbourne Home Interview Travel Survey and the Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel and Activity, conducted some 30 years later in 2007/08. Key behavioural indicators used in transport planning analysis are examined and compared, including weekday peak period and all-day travel by mode, travel generation rates, trip length frequencies, average trip lengths and public transport mode share by time of day and purpose. The outcomes provide useful insights into the travel patterns and behaviours of Melbournians that are of relevance in transport planning and policy analysis. They may be further considered in the context of land-use, demographic, transport network development and transport policy impacts that have occurred in Melbourne over this 30 year period, and the influences that these have had on travel. Of interest are not only the changes in travel behaviour, but also those behaviours that have remained stable. 1.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper compares travel behaviour for Melbourne reported in the 1978/79 Melbourne Home Interview Travel Survey and the Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel and Activity, conducted some 30 years later in 2007/08. Key behavioural indicators used in transport planning analysis are examined and compared, including weekday peak period and all-day travel by mode, travel generation rates, trip length frequencies, average trip lengths and public transport mode share by time of day and purpose. The outcomes provide useful insights into the travel patterns and behaviours of Melbournians that are of relevance in transport planning and policy analysis. They may be further considered in the context of land-use, demographic, transport network development and transport policy impacts that have occurred in Melbourne over this 30 year period, and the influences that these have had on travel. Of interest are not only the changes in travel behaviour, but also those behaviours that have remained stable. 1.
Key concepts: Public transport, Travel behavior, Travel survey, Context (archaeology), Transport engineering, Journey to work, Travel time, Transport policy