2014•Unpublished venueRequires access

Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems

Christoffer Green‐Pedersen, Stefaan Walgrave

Open publisher page 167 citations

Abstract

Italy underwent a major political upheaval at the beginning of the 1990s. The then 40 year-old party system shifted from a case of polarised multipartism to one of bipolar alternation. Given this peculiar conditions, Italy represents an interesting case to study the effects of variation in party competition on the national legislative agenda, other factors remaining relatively constant. The background assumption is that in the new system of alternation, Italian governing parties have more incentives to enact laws in areas which receive greater emphasis in their policy platform, so as to comply with their electoral mandate. This chapter explores the party-policy link by analysing the correspondence between the legislative agenda (adopted laws) and the party agenda publicized during electoral campaigns (political manifestos of winning coalition/parties). The study covers a period of 24 years (1983-2006), during which 6 national elections were held.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Italy underwent a major political upheaval at the beginning of the 1990s. The then 40 year-old party system shifted from a case of polarised multipartism to one of bipolar alternation. Given this peculiar conditions, Italy represents an interesting case to study the effects of variation in party competition on the national legislative agenda, other factors remaining relatively constant. The background assumption is that in the new system of alternation, Italian governing parties have more incentives to enact laws in areas which receive greater emphasis in their policy platform, so as to comply with their electoral mandate. This chapter explores the party-policy link by analysing the correspondence between the legislative agenda (adopted laws) and the party agenda publicized during electoral campaigns (political manifestos of winning coalition/parties). The study covers a period of 24 years (1983-2006), during which 6 national elections were held.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 167 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Italy underwent a major political upheaval at the beginning of the 1990s. The then 40 year-old party system shifted from a case of polarised multipartism to one of bipolar alternation. Given this peculiar conditions, Italy represents an interesting case to study the effects of variation in party competition on the national legislative agenda, other factors remaining relatively constant. The background assumption is that in the new system of alternation, Italian governing parties have more incentives to enact laws in areas which receive greater emphasis in their policy platform, so as to comply with their electoral mandate. This chapter explores the party-policy link by analysing the correspondence between the legislative agenda (adopted laws) and the party agenda publicized during electoral campaigns (political manifestos of winning coalition/parties). The study covers a period of 24 years (1983-2006), during which 6 national elections were held.

Key concepts: Politics, German, Political science, Craft, Political economy, Government (linguistics), Political system, Immigration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens