1992•Built EnvironmentRequires access

Compact or dispersed? dilution is no solution

Duncan P. McLaren

Open publisher page 75 citations

Abstract

It has taken many years to establish the argument that pollution prevention is required to control environmental damage. Policies for pollution dispersal influenced by the self-interest of the industrial lobbies gave us taller chimneys (and acid rain) and longer outfalls (and polluted seas). Pollution dispersal has been a failure. Moreover, the most pressing pollution problem we face is already dispersed: the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere with the associated threat of an unprecedented rate of climate change. It is the total quantity of carbon dioxide (C02) in the atmosphere that is the problem: not whether it is concentrated or dispersed. Climate change has rapidly climbed national and international political and research agendas. The main contributors to the problem are carbon dioxide, CFCs, methane, nitrogen oxides and ozone. The 1990 report of the inter Governmental Panel on Climate Change indicated that a reduction in carbon dioxide

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It has taken many years to establish the argument that pollution prevention is required to control environmental damage. Policies for pollution dispersal influenced by the self-interest of the industrial lobbies gave us taller chimneys (and acid rain) and longer outfalls (and polluted seas). Pollution dispersal has been a failure. Moreover, the most pressing pollution problem we face is already dispersed: the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere with the associated threat of an unprecedented rate of climate change. It is the total quantity of carbon dioxide (C02) in the atmosphere that is the problem: not whether it is concentrated or dispersed. Climate change has rapidly climbed national and international political and research agendas. The main contributors to the problem are carbon dioxide, CFCs, methane, nitrogen oxides and ozone. The 1990 report of the inter Governmental Panel on Climate Change indicated that a reduction in carbon dioxide

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 75 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It has taken many years to establish the argument that pollution prevention is required to control environmental damage. Policies for pollution dispersal influenced by the self-interest of the industrial lobbies gave us taller chimneys (and acid rain) and longer outfalls (and polluted seas). Pollution dispersal has been a failure. Moreover, the most pressing pollution problem we face is already dispersed: the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere with the associated threat of an unprecedented rate of climate change. It is the total quantity of carbon dioxide (C02) in the atmosphere that is the problem: not whether it is concentrated or dispersed. Climate change has rapidly climbed national and international political and research agendas. The main contributors to the problem are carbon dioxide, CFCs, methane, nitrogen oxides and ozone. The 1990 report of the inter Governmental Panel on Climate Change indicated that a reduction in carbon dioxide

Key concepts: Pollution, Environmental science, Greenhouse gas, Climate change, Air pollution, Carbon dioxide, Atmosphere (unit), Environmental engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Compact or dispersed? dilution is no solution — Research Paper | ScholarLens