2013•Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders

F. Necati Çatbaş, Haider Darwash, Manar A. Al Fadul

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Florida I-Beam (FIB) girders provide a number of advantages such as higher load carrying capacity, more efficient fabrication, safer construction, increased lateral stiffness, larger vertical clearance and reduction in the overall cost of bridges. A comparative study incorporating two bridges, one with AASHTO Type III and the other with new Florida I-Beam (FIB) girders is presented. The first bridge is a 3 span bridge designed with 6 AASHTO Type III girders. The second bridge has the same length, width and girder depth; however, it has 4 FIB girders. Both bridges are analyzed using the conventional AASHTO LRFD girder line analysis method and also with a more sophisticated finite element method using a commercial software. The details of the FE model are also presented with the critical considerations of link elements, boundary conditions, pre-stressing tendons. Based on the FE model results, it is shown that it is possible to expect 20% higher live load capacity for interior girders and 40% higher live load capacity for exterior girders using FIB-45 girders compared to AASHTO Type III girders, while also reducing the cost by about 24%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Florida I-Beam (FIB) girders provide a number of advantages such as higher load carrying capacity, more efficient fabrication, safer construction, increased lateral stiffness, larger vertical clearance and reduction in the overall cost of bridges. A comparative study incorporating two bridges, one with AASHTO Type III and the other with new Florida I-Beam (FIB) girders is presented. The first bridge is a 3 span bridge designed with 6 AASHTO Type III girders. The second bridge has the same length, width and girder depth; however, it has 4 FIB girders. Both bridges are analyzed using the conventional AASHTO LRFD girder line analysis method and also with a more sophisticated finite element method using a commercial software. The details of the FE model are also presented with the critical considerations of link elements, boundary conditions, pre-stressing tendons. Based on the FE model results, it is shown that it is possible to expect 20% higher live load capacity for interior girders and 40% higher live load capacity for exterior girders using FIB-45 girders compared to AASHTO Type III girders, while also reducing the cost by about 24%.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Florida I-Beam (FIB) girders provide a number of advantages such as higher load carrying capacity, more efficient fabrication, safer construction, increased lateral stiffness, larger vertical clearance and reduction in the overall cost of bridges. A comparative study incorporating two bridges, one with AASHTO Type III and the other with new Florida I-Beam (FIB) girders is presented. The first bridge is a 3 span bridge designed with 6 AASHTO Type III girders. The second bridge has the same length, width and girder depth; however, it has 4 FIB girders. Both bridges are analyzed using the conventional AASHTO LRFD girder line analysis method and also with a more sophisticated finite element method using a commercial software. The details of the FE model are also presented with the critical considerations of link elements, boundary conditions, pre-stressing tendons. Based on the FE model results, it is shown that it is possible to expect 20% higher live load capacity for interior girders and 40% higher live load capacity for exterior girders using FIB-45 girders compared to AASHTO Type III girders, while also reducing the cost by about 24%.

Key concepts: Girder, Structural engineering, Engineering, Stiffness, Span (engineering), Beam (structure), Finite element method, Bridge (graph theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders — Research Paper | ScholarLens