Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders
F. Necati Çatbaş, Haider Darwash, Manar A. Al Fadul
Abstract
F. Necati Çatbaş, Haider Darwash, Manar A. Al Fadul
Abstract
Florida I-Beam (FIB) girders provide a number of advantages such as higher load carrying capacity, more efficient fabrication, safer construction, increased lateral stiffness, larger vertical clearance and reduction in the overall cost of bridges. A comparative study incorporating two bridges, one with AASHTO Type III and the other with new Florida I-Beam (FIB) girders is presented. The first bridge is a 3 span bridge designed with 6 AASHTO Type III girders. The second bridge has the same length, width and girder depth; however, it has 4 FIB girders. Both bridges are analyzed using the conventional AASHTO LRFD girder line analysis method and also with a more sophisticated finite element method using a commercial software. The details of the FE model are also presented with the critical considerations of link elements, boundary conditions, pre-stressing tendons. Based on the FE model results, it is shown that it is possible to expect 20% higher live load capacity for interior girders and 40% higher live load capacity for exterior girders using FIB-45 girders compared to AASHTO Type III girders, while also reducing the cost by about 24%.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Florida I-Beam (FIB) girders provide a number of advantages such as higher load carrying capacity, more efficient fabrication, safer construction, increased lateral stiffness, larger vertical clearance and reduction in the overall cost of bridges. A comparative study incorporating two bridges, one with AASHTO Type III and the other with new Florida I-Beam (FIB) girders is presented. The first bridge is a 3 span bridge designed with 6 AASHTO Type III girders. The second bridge has the same length, width and girder depth; however, it has 4 FIB girders. Both bridges are analyzed using the conventional AASHTO LRFD girder line analysis method and also with a more sophisticated finite element method using a commercial software. The details of the FE model are also presented with the critical considerations of link elements, boundary conditions, pre-stressing tendons. Based on the FE model results, it is shown that it is possible to expect 20% higher live load capacity for interior girders and 40% higher live load capacity for exterior girders using FIB-45 girders compared to AASHTO Type III girders, while also reducing the cost by about 24%.
Key concepts: Girder, Structural engineering, Engineering, Stiffness, Span (engineering), Beam (structure), Finite element method, Bridge (graph theory)